Here are my dice analyzer results - I've rolled more than some, less than others...but statistically, it works out:

dbz
It may be true that math cannot predict randomness, however it is not the case that randomness cannot be tested after the fact.aceage wrote:still, math cannot predict randomness
No one can predict randomness, thats why it is called random
Actually, to have 13 men lose to a country when attacking if it is only defended by a single troop is closer to 1 to 192,308. Not bad considering how many dice are rolled every day here at CC. Don't Believe me: Check This Outrichnpoor wrote: to lose 13 consequitive times rolling 3 dice against one the odds are :
3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3 to 1 or 1,594,323 against losing 13 men in a row when attacking 1 man rolling 3 dice against 1
I say when the odds are 1,594,323 to against something happening and it does thats a STATISICAL ANOMOLY that needs an explanation. especially if it happens on more than one occassion
Math doesnt lie, regardless of whether the dice work for or against you that just aint right lol
just curious, about how many dice a day are rolled at CC?zarvinny wrote:Actually, to have 13 men lose to a country when attacking if it is only defended by a single troop is closer to 1 to 192,308. Not bad considering how many dice are rolled every day here at CC. Don't Believe me: Check This Outrichnpoor wrote: to lose 13 consequitive times rolling 3 dice against one the odds are :
3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3 to 1 or 1,594,323 against losing 13 men in a row when attacking 1 man rolling 3 dice against 1
I say when the odds are 1,594,323 to against something happening and it does thats a STATISICAL ANOMOLY that needs an explanation. especially if it happens on more than one occassion
Math doesnt lie, regardless of whether the dice work for or against you that just aint right lol
Yeah.AAFitz wrote:30000...heh....i threw 160000...all within a percentage point...mosty even, some crazy good rolls, some crazy bad rolls...go figure...they almost seem random
curious as to how you arrived at your odds however I assure you that mine are correct according to the laws of probabilitybob3603 wrote:just curious, about how many dice a day are rolled at CC?zarvinny wrote:Actually, to have 13 men lose to a country when attacking if it is only defended by a single troop is closer to 1 to 192,308. Not bad considering how many dice are rolled every day here at CC. Don't Believe me: Check This Outrichnpoor wrote: to lose 13 consequitive times rolling 3 dice against one the odds are :
3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3 to 1 or 1,594,323 against losing 13 men in a row when attacking 1 man rolling 3 dice against 1
I say when the odds are 1,594,323 to against something happening and it does thats a STATISICAL ANOMOLY that needs an explanation. especially if it happens on more than one occassion
Math doesnt lie, regardless of whether the dice work for or against you that just aint right lol
i sort of agree. thats the ONE thing i like about land grab. even though i win and lose just as many rolls as i do here, its very rarely in giant sprees of death or ownage.richnpoor wrote:These dice definately need a patch ....there is no way they are generating random numbers consistently.
They seem to get stuck on win or lose. I have noticed that if I lose 2 men 3 times in a row while Im attacking i will continue to lose 2 men with each roll no matter how long it goes
I actually tried an experiment with this in a game which cost me the game I had 32 men to attack 6 after killing off 2 of my opponent I lost 2 men 3 times in a row so I kept rolling just to see how long it would go on.
I rolled 11 more times attacking the same country from the same country didnt change a thing and lost 2 men 11 more str8 times added to the original 6 thats 28 and i only killed 2
The same think happens if you are attacking a country with only 1 on it and you lose 3 times in a row. I tried same experiment and lost 10 more straight
How is it possible when rolling 3 dice to 1 to have the single die beat you for 13 consequative rolls. thats 39 to 13 and didnt win once
rich
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
this just happened to me....richnpoor wrote: to lose 13 consequitive times rolling 3 dice against one the odds are :
3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3x3 to 1 or 1,594,323 against losing 13 men in a row when attacking 1 man rolling 3 dice against 1
I say when the odds are 1,594,323 to against something happening and it does thats a STATISICAL ANOMOLY that needs an explanation. especially if it happens on more than one occassion
Math doesnt lie, regardless of whether the dice work for or against you that just aint right lol