The Pentagon looks into gay weapons

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:34 pm

The Gay Bomb

Nephilim · Post by **Nephilim** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:36 pm

i wish they would drop that on the jesus freaks clubhouse....jay_a2j could finally release all that repressed sexuality

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:05 pm

...

Wow.

funkeymunkey · Post by **funkeymunkey** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:08 pm

O.......M.....G

d.gishman · Post by **d.gishman** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 pm

I wonder who was smoking what when they thought of that

2dimes · Post by **2dimes** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:34 pm

This could be pretty funny when the wind shifts and "freindly fire" hits home.

chewyman · Post by **chewyman** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:49 pm

Well on a serious note, at least they are looking into non-lethal weapons.

Still hilarious though

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:05 pm

Outstanding! ROTFLMAO.

lduke1990 · Post by **lduke1990** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:13 am

so what it's an explosive device that makes people happy?

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:32 am

add this to the list of trauma suffered during war:
being raped by an enemy soldier

chewyman · Post by **chewyman** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:32 am

lduke1990 wrote:so what it's an explosive device that makes people happy?

Words change their meanings. Do you say 'you' or 'ye'? Unless you're speaking ye olde English you're just going to have to get over the new meaning for the word 'gay'.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:35 am

lduke1990 wrote:so what it's an explosive device that makes people happy?

nitrous oxide. DUH.

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:16 am

Doesn't say anything about making soldiers gay, just making them temporarily irresistably attractive to one another (granted, as most armies are composed primarily of men, it would be something they might not be used to...)
Seems like the same effect could be had by parachuting prostitutes into army bases; the soldiers would (hypothetically) get too distracted to care about invading good guys, a la the Hessians at the Battle of Trenton (and come on, could that fail to be hilarious?)

Jenos Ridan · Post by **Jenos Ridan** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:46 am

Hitman079 wrote:add this to the list of trauma suffered during war:
being raped by an enemy soldier

Believe it or not, it happens anyway. Especially, saddly, to any womenfolk caught in the crossfire.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:02 am

Brings a whole new meaning to dont ask dont tell.

Jenos Ridan · Post by **Jenos Ridan** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:06 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Brings a whole new meaning to dont ask dont tell.

'Shell-shock' warps mens minds baddly enough, so this would make them catatonic.

b.k. barunt · Post by **b.k. barunt** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:21 pm

So the end result of this bomb would be more republicans?

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:50 pm

They should develop something like this and make it work on women.

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:08 pm

2dimes · Post by **2dimes** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:18 pm

Picture the C.O. giving orders a little too late.

In comming!!
Don your chemical resistant gear!

Oh, except um, the... pants.

You won't be needing those.

gethine · Post by **gethine** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 4:22 pm

2dimes wrote:Picture the C.O. giving orders a little too late.

In comming!!
Don your chemical resistant gear!

Oh, except um, the... pants.

You won't be needing those.

i guess they could get six foot condoms to wear as a chemical suit. to kill the passion.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 8:24 pm

MeDeFe wrote:They should develop something like this and make it work on women.

damn, you beat me to it.

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:25 pm

b.k. barunt wrote:So the end result of this bomb would be more republicans?

I thought we Republicans are supposed to be homophobes, and therefore, by nature, anti-gays, and therefore, most likely to NEVER be gay?

safariguy5 · Post by **safariguy5** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:32 pm

Once again reaffirming that "military intelligence" is an oxymoron.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Tue Jun 12, 2007 9:36 pm

spurgistan wrote:Doesn't say anything about making soldiers gay, just making them temporarily irresistably attractive to one another (granted, as most armies are composed primarily of men, it would be something they might not be used to...)
Seems like the same effect could be had by parachuting prostitutes into army bases; the soldiers would (hypothetically) get too distracted to care about invading good guys, a la the Hessians at the Battle of Trenton (and come on, could that fail to be hilarious?)

i see no proof of that statement. weren't they just drunk, since they believed the storm would keep the "confused" americans away?