nagerous wrote:I have reread and I have a gut feeling that talapus is scum.
He quickly and suddenly hammered the guy who was claiming Dumbledore, cop and dredged up the incident yesterday regarding me which had already been cleared up (as subtlety as possible) and said something along the lines: "if mandy is wrong we lynch him tomorrow" which was not a good idea as I now have confidence in his pro-towness.
vote talapus
You sir, are an idiot. There was noting quick about my voting for Haoala. I posted numerous suspicions and ideas, and was watching him long before I voted for him. Yet with all that, many other players came on and said 1, maybe 2 things and voted for him as well after I had said my 2 cents(Yes, I'm implying you need to read what happened at the beginning of the day, not just my post at the end). Just because I finally voted for him which was the lynch, don't lie and said I did it quickly. Pull your head out of your ass and reexamine the evidence! It's all there, whether you choose to read it or not.
I've had numerous arguments with you before in other games and can't quite tell if you just have it out for me, or you think I'm a threat. Either way, please read everything I post before you post garbage like this. You should know by now I won't go down without a fight, and I actually examine ALL the evidence before posting. Not just the evidence I want to interpret.
In all the mafia games I've played, I've never lied when roleclaiming. I won't role claim yet because it's very dangerous to do with so many players. But for right now I will tell you I
am pro-town...
As for still having my suspicions against you and mandy. Yes, they are still there. You both argued well, and even though I'm not sure I believe your "clues", you aren't the guiltiest looking players. So, I've dropped it. You should do the same and look at other things!
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Has anyone thought of the possability that Mandy is a lyncher with nag as his lynchee target? I really dont' have enough evidence to vote on him Mandy.
Posted: 06 Jun 2007 14:42 by FOS Dummies Post subject:
yeah i do want a role claim. i want you to prove to me that you aren't scum. and yes when you claim i want a characters name. anyone can say i am (doctor) or (cop). it is harder to make up a character name from HP to fit the role. that way your HP name can help verify your claim or it can help expose its falseness. therefore if you want to survive today i want your claim and your name
That sure didn't help on day 1 by lynching the cop even after he gave name and profession in the game.
Vote FOS Dummies for pushing for role claims AGAIN
There are quite a few players I have my eye on right now, but for dummies is by far the guiltiest looking one in the game. Twice he's pushed for roleclaims and so far looks as though he plans to continue. I'm not the only one who's noticed(see above quote), but he still looks guilty.
Also, he's not the only person to push for role claims, but he does it in such a way that it strikes me as odd.
Throughout most of the reasons he's provided, I find myself believing him less and less. And now, we have this little pearl of wisdom:
for dummies wrote:after our long and invigorating battle yesterday i am inclined to believe nagerous. therefore Vote talapus. i sincerely hope you are right sir
WHY?!?! Why believe him? That's your reason for voting me? That's not really a reason at all, and it explains nothing. I don't trust you. You push the wrong players too hard and you don't provide enough evidence to back it up. It almost seems as though you are trying to side with whoever appears to be winning the arguement at the time so you can coast through this game without being noticed. Well dummies....I noticed, and I don't like it!
So,
Vote - - - for dummies
On a side note...LSU Tiger Josh, I would appreciate it if you follow up with all your evidence in the future and not just the latest piece before you cast a vote. Overlooking prior evidence in a game could hurt the town in the long run...just a thought.