You have a point there, but I'm not entirely convinced by red bull's claim...MountainLion wrote:Not voting for dummies and voting Biscuit does look pretty bad. What do you have to say about that, pancake?
Moderator: Community Team
Grahh. I've been in this situation before and I always get lynched.MountainLion wrote:Not voting for dummies and voting Biscuit does look pretty bad. What do you have to say about that, pancake?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Aimless, you said we can't wait forever and we don't want a no lynch to explain your vote on red bull. The reason I asked you about it is because you did this after only one day when we have four days to get a lynch.Aimless wrote:I want to hear what he has to say, but we can't wait forever. Like I said, I don't want another no lynch.MountainLion wrote:why are you guys voting red bull when it's obvious he has something to say?
Please no one else vote him until he posts! It only takes 5 to lynch.
If he has a good lead, though, I'll unvote.
Yeah. I'm also strongly concerned about the past history of the game - ie, we've had three no lynches already. red bull wasn't in any particular danger from my vote, so I didn't see a reason to delay it.MountainLion wrote:Aimless, you said we can't wait forever and we don't want a no lynch to explain your vote on red bull. The reason I asked you about it is because you did this after only one day when we have four days to get a lynch.Aimless wrote:I want to hear what he has to say, but we can't wait forever. Like I said, I don't want another no lynch.MountainLion wrote:why are you guys voting red bull when it's obvious he has something to say?
Please no one else vote him until he posts! It only takes 5 to lynch.
If he has a good lead, though, I'll unvote.
FOS Aimless
opp, orry,typo.MountainLion wrote:What do you mean by "5 mafia on the loose" after you said you think there are 4 mafia members?jnd94 wrote:There are 13 players total, so Im assuming there are 4 mafia members. If we go with that, we still have 5 mafia on the loose.
Not Voting: mandalorian2298, Fircoal, pancakemix, jnd94
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
lol then you are one messed up role blockerAimless wrote:*sigh*
I didn't want to have to admit this, but I will in order to prevent a no lynch.
I'm the Roleblocker, and red bull has been my target for the past two nights.
Vote Red Bull.Aimless wrote:*sigh*
I didn't want to have to admit this, but I will in order to prevent a no lynch.
I'm the Roleblocker, and red bull has been my target for the past two nights.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
alright then vote mepancakemix wrote:Wow...
There is only one way to see if Aimless is telling the truth, and that's to lynch you. Yet you continue to try and push attention away from yourself and on to me. You are most certainly scum, sir.
Take a look back a minute. Aimless votes him, as does IGS. He votes me in an obvious attempt to try and get himself away from harm. Aimless has claimed roleblocker and that he has been blocking red bull this entire time. Yet he still says after I vote him when he is almost absolutely confirmed as scum that I look scummy. Is that in no way worthy of ridiculous to you?jnd94 wrote:thats sounded somewhat scummy, sir. FOS pancakepancakemix wrote:Wow...
There is only one way to see if Aimless is telling the truth, and that's to lynch you. Yet you continue to try and push attention away from yourself and on to me. You are most certainly scum, sir.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.