Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/quicklyriskllama wrote:lol, define "quickly"...
Meh- no- I don't really feel like getting drawn into an abusive argument in C&A, sorry RL.riskllama wrote:no, you idiot - define it in the context of C&A...



For clarify,xroads wrote:I find it very convenient that a newbie somehow infiltrated and befriended one of the top clans around, notorious for high standards. Its also odd how Gabriel has now emptied his wall of all the comments from TOP players.
There is no way they didnt know it was him.
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=18506052
So you really expect everyone to believe that 5 top players agreed to play with a cadet after he had been on the site for less than a week in a triples game? Come on give me a break


For exemple, in case are wining some tournament, we can be punished and S&M can take it.xroads wrote:...
So now the question should be, what should be done with the members of TOP who are complicit in this scheme?


Gabriels Hammer wrote:Hey there,
I am new to this site and trying to get some experience on some maps I like. Saw you recently played a game on one of the maps I like. Would you have time for a quick game? Let me know and I'll invite you to one.
Thanks, Gabe
xroads wrote:...
So now the question should be, what should be done with the members of TOP who are complicit in this scheme?
It would be hard not to know it was him. Too many coincidences. But, nothing that could ever be proved. Also, is there a rule against playing with previously banned players?Donelladan wrote:xroads wrote:...
So now the question should be, what should be done with the members of TOP who are complicit in this scheme?
I don't think there is any way we can prove TOP member were complicit in his scheme. Thus, nothing should be done with them. ( and first we should be sure he is PaulatPeace ofc... despite the evidence, it's not done yet).
You can't argue that because they played one game with him, they were complicit.
Gabriels Hammer also send me a pm, same as the other.
I was also very surprised that he asked me because I didnt play antartica games recently.
I then assumed he was a multi, I checked his game and was quite impressed by the fact he mastered antartica from his first game.
I politely declined.
But I also play games with newbies that seems nice and ask politely ( when they aren't multi), so I totally believe macken explanation.
That is what stood out to me.Keefie wrote:There is always a slip, always.
Honor!
This is it.
xroads: Firstly, I remind you that I have noted that this game as with most of my games are public (if not all) and anyone can join from the time I became Conqueror and even before then. Not just GH, even you can join but in no way, that meant I knew, or liked you, let alone agreed to play with you beforehand. No permission is required at all.xroads wrote:I find it very convenient that a newbie somehow infiltrated and befriended one of the top clans around, notorious for high standards. Its also odd how Gabriel has now emptied his wall of all the comments from TOP players.
There is no way they didnt know it was him.
https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=18506052
So you really expect everyone to believe that 5 top players agreed to play with a cadet after he had been on the site for less than a week in a triples game? Come on give me a break