Real Alliances

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
GreecePwns
Posts: 2646
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lawn Guy Lint

Real Alliances

Post by GreecePwns »

Suggestion Idea: Have some way to offer alliances that cannot be broken.

Specifics: One player would offer an alliance to the other, choosing from the two types. One way for alliances include whole player alliances. This alliances does not let the two allies from attacking any of each others' territories. Another choice could be single territory alliances. These alliances only apply to one of each players' bordering territories.

The offered player could choose to accept, decline, or counter (change length or type of alliance).

Alliances would last somewhere between 1-5 rounds.

Alliances will be known by everyone in the game.

Why it is needed: This will stop unwanted breaking of alliances that could ruin a game. This would be just an option, and even if it is chosen, players can neogotiate the normal way.

Priority: 3.5-4
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

no.
bad idea
people would abuse that and you could get in an alliance that is bad for you and makes you lose.
Image
User avatar
kwanton
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Post by kwanton »

wcaclimbing wrote:no.
bad idea
people would abuse that and you could get in an alliance that is bad for you and makes you lose.
Alliances are and important part of this game. i don't use em myself but if there was an official system I might. Getting into "an alliance that is bad for you" shouldn't be a problem if a person is smart enough to figure out what is strategically best.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Post by AndyDufresne »

Hm, I don't think having 'strict alliances', would be all that well. And as the above post mentioned, there could be some unfavorable abuse of the system, especially with people new to the game.


--Andy
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8036
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

Just as you can decieve your opponent o the board game, I think that alliances should not be in the rules.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”