[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
YukFoo wrote:2 games isn't enough to make a determination.
It's precisely because it's only two games that one can immediately spot a player who knows exactly what he/she is doing and is experienced far beyond two games.
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
I also wouldn't be surprised if olegrubel is the same player using a proxy. His flag keeps changing, they play games together, and olegrubel doesn't attack him. Just smells fishy.
Highest position #5 (18 Nov 2010) General 4,380pts (11 Dec 2010)
Out of SupercoolFred's 6 games. The new recruit "olegrubel" is in half (3 games).
Furthermore, this new recruit "olegrubel" has a 75% win ratio (3/4 games).
Now to me, I would say that olegrubel is a multi based on his high win ratio and that olegrubel seems to play like a seasoned pro.
In contrast to Supercoolfred who plays like a dipshit noob and will have only 1/6 wins...
Perhaps I could see how Supercoolfred and olegrubel are multis, but only based on the way in which olegrubel plays. The manner in which Supercoolfred has played does not in any way scream multi.
I am curious as to why you would not make this thread about olegrubel, or at least mention olegrubel, when they have a much higher win ratio and they play more like a pro than does Supercoolfred???
Everything is possible, same as this guy who within his first two week on the site, and after he joined the site December 17th, was able to win the December most improved as well as the 7 Days of Conquer Club event
Mad777 wrote:Everything is possible, same as this guy who within his first two week on the site, and after he joined the site December 17th, was able to win the December most improved as well as the 7 Days of Conquer Club event
Soooooooooo easy to win the Biggest Loser competition when you are the biggest loser!