Moderator: Community Team
7171 today. Yep, I agree it seems to be leveling-off. I would feel a little better about that position if the number increased occasionally, or even just once or twice since the decline reemerged. Only time will tell. I do wish that there was a way to get better retention, considering that we got it all the way up to 14K+ (if my memory is accurate) at the height of the Spring phase of this pandemic.Davie.K wrote:CivProBlows wrote:7297Davie.K wrote:Yep,been keeping an eye on those figures the last week or two and although it is still dropping,it does seem to have slowed dramatically ..... Wonder what will happen with the 2nd wave ?CivProBlows wrote:7425
Yep,that certainly does seem that we have reached our levelling out point .....still going but dripping away now.....we are a steady 7,000 which is 2,500 better than a year ago.....so in reality probably 3,000-3,5000 better off than were we would have been without the plague......so every cloud so to speak
Nasty number!Davie.K wrote:6969 right now .... the ONLY highlight of the decrease mrswdk
Pirlo wrote:Nasty number!Davie.K wrote:6969 right now .... the ONLY highlight of the decrease mrswdk
Wink at me again and I'll pepper spray you.Davie.K wrote:6969 right now .... the ONLY highlight of the decrease mrswdk


Year over year we are still doing great!!!TeeGee - Sept 3 2019 wrote:4958
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
THE BEST NUMBERS!riskllama wrote:just tremendous numbers, really...
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.


time to get that prescription refilled!!!Pirlo wrote:When I look at the number of online users, I see it's like only 60% of the number I used to find a year ago.
This indicates CC is not even stable and non-growing; rather, it's declining!

riskllama wrote:*6464

Dukasaur wrote:We need a "like" button...
