Triples and Doubles Games

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
FM Harper
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 8:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: Edinburgh

Triples and Doubles Games

Post by FM Harper »

Hey, I was just playing a triples game and I'm being a complete idiot and finding it hard to work out who is to go next. Would it be possible to change (or have as an option) the order the players to who goes next (like in non-team games) rather than the teams, yet still state who is in what team?

I doubt that is at all clear. Reply if you haven't a clue what I'm on about.

:wink:
dominationnation
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:20 am

Post by dominationnation »

I have no idea what you are talking about :wink:
User avatar
Nickbaldwin
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:07 am
Location: Scut hole near Birmingham

Post by Nickbaldwin »

I know what he means. The players are grouped by team, so that they arent in play order, which is quite confusing as you dont initially know whos next.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
dominationnation
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:20 am

Post by dominationnation »

Nickbaldwin wrote:I know what he means. The players are grouped by team, so that they arent in play order, which is quite confusing as you dont initially know whos next.
I still dont quite get it. Are you saying so that instead of

Player A/Team1
Player D/team 2
player B/team 1
player E/team 2
player C/team 1
player F/team 2

the turns would go random?
User avatar
Nickbaldwin
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 9:07 am
Location: Scut hole near Birmingham

Post by Nickbaldwin »

Nope. What currently happens is:

Team 1:
player1: goes 1st
player2: goes 3rd
player3: goes 5th

Team 2:
player4: goes 2nd
player5: goes 4th
player6: goes last

I think hes proposing (in this example), ordering the players as:

player1
player4
player2
player5
player3
player6

In turn order.

If you catch my drift.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
LOCK THIS FUCKING THREAD.
dominationnation
Posts: 4234
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:20 am

Post by dominationnation »

oh. well in that case the answer is no. It wouldnt work. The whole point of going like this is so that you get the chance to break each others bonuses.
User avatar
Keredrex
Posts: 400
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:41 am
Gender: Male
Location: New York

Wierd

Post by Keredrex »

In all honesty there is no difference... You are just grouping the names by play order instead of team order.... it really isn't hard to figure it out the way it is now
User avatar
FM Harper
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 8:57 am
Gender: Male
Location: Edinburgh

Re: Wierd

Post by FM Harper »

Nickbaldwin wrote: Nope. What currently happens is:

Team 1:
player1: goes 1st
player2: goes 3rd
player3: goes 5th

Team 2:
player4: goes 2nd
player5: goes 4th
player6: goes last

I think hes proposing (in this example), ordering the players as:

player1
player4
player2
player5
player3
player6

In turn order.

If you catch my drift.
Exactly what Im saying. Not changing the order the players go but simply changing the order they are listed in the game.
Keredrex wrote:In all honesty there is no difference... You are just grouping the names by play order instead of team order.... it really isn't hard to figure it out the way it is now
Fair enough... I'm just being thick.

Thanks guys. :roll:
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”