Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Either trolling or not getting it. Attacking with the aim to win the game is one thing, or playing with a differing strategy... Attacking to make a different player win and put you at no advantage or shot of winning is throwing and game manipulation.iAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.

So what was Dbandit doing then?Swimmerdude99 wrote:Either trolling or not getting it. Attacking with the aim to win the game is one thing, or playing with a differing strategy... Attacking to make a different player win and put you at no advantage or shot of winning is throwing and game manipulation.iAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.

DB was trying to prevent this from happening as he had hinted before that he preferred another winner ("not going to nuke your bonus to help you catch up to the leaders'). DB didnt notice the small stacks near my stack due to small colour differences.jfm10 wrote:2022-01-04 15:36:46 - chanakam2020: 3 more rounds
2022-01-04 15:38:25 - Chewie1: gg extreme well played
2022-01-04 15:39:00 - chanakam2020: gg Extreme Ways
2022-01-04 15:41:12 - the warrior65: gg Extreme
2022-01-04 15:41:57 - DBandit70: Extreme loves getting suicided into if anyone wanted to
2022-01-04 15:42:23 - Extreme Ways: no I dont
2022-01-04 15:42:25 - murphy16: Watch my last round move
2022-01-04 15:43:39 - Extreme Ways: you joke but there's actually some risk involved and some people love to ruin someone else's game without any gain
2022-01-04 15:43:45 - Extreme Ways: especially when theres prior beef
2022-01-04 15:43:58 - murphy16: Will be spectacular
2022-01-04 15:44:40 - DBandit70: gg Extreme well played
2022-01-04 15:45:15 - murphy16: Nuked myself
2022-01-04 15:45:22 - DBandit70:
what Andrito did is wrong but game log EW last comment to DB smile
2022-01-04 15:43:41 - DBandit70 received 3 troops for 1 regions
2022-01-04 15:43:47 - DBandit70 deployed 3 troops on Orange-E
2022-01-04 15:43:49 - DBandit70 assaulted Orange-B from Orange-E and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:50 - DBandit70 assaulted Orange-D from Orange-B and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:51 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-X from Orange-D and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:52 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-W from Center-X and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:54 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-S from Center-W and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:55 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-L from Center-S and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:57 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-M from Center-L and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:43:59 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-G from Center-L and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:00 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-K from Center-G and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:01 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-J from Center-K and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:02 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-D from Center-J and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:03 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-E from Center-D and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:04 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-F from Center-D and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:05 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-C from Red-F and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:06 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-A from Red-C and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:07 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-B from Red-A and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:09 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-E from Red-B and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:10 - DBandit70 assaulted Red-D from Red-E and conquered it from Andrito
2022-01-04 15:44:11 - DBandit70 assaulted Center-P from Red-D and conquered it from neutral player
2022-01-04 15:44:12 - DBandit70 assaulted Orange-F from Center-P and conquered it from neutral player
2022-01-04 15:44:14 - DBandit70 assaulted Orange-C from Orange-F and conquered it from neutral player
2022-01-04 15:44:15 - DBandit70 assaulted Orange-A from Orange-C and conquered it from neutral player
2022-01-04 15:44:18 - DBandit70 reinforced Center-M with 13 troops from Orange-C
2022-01-04 15:44:18 - DBandit70 ended the turn and got spoils
2022-01-04 15:44:28 - murphy16 received 3 troops for 3 regions
2022-01-04 15:44:38 - murphy16 played a set of Yellow-A, Blue-E, and Orange-B nuking each region
2022-01-04 15:44:46 - murphy16 deployed 3 troops on Yellow-B
2022-01-04 15:44:55 - murphy16 ended the turn
2022-01-04 15:45:21 - Andrito received 3 troops for 2 regions
losing a bonus and 6 armies by the 3rd last player was the action that led to the reaction.
I can only speculate that he was around 3rd place when he finished round 19 but I would say he was probably proud of his accomplishment until round 20 .
You said yourself there was some but we only saw one
2022-01-04 15:45:21 - Andrito received 3 troops for 2 regions
2022-01-04 15:45:28 - Andrito played a set of Center-E, Red-C, and Blue-D nuking each region
2022-01-04 15:45:31 - Andrito deployed 3 troops on Green-B
2022-01-04 15:45:33 - Andrito assaulted Green-A from Green-B and conquered it from Extreme Ways
2022-01-04 15:45:36 - Andrito assaulted Green-C from Green-A and conquered it from Extreme Ways
2022-01-04 15:45:44 - Andrito assaulted Green-E from Green-D and conquered it from Extreme Ways
2022-01-04 15:45:55 - Andrito ran out of time
2022-01-04 15:45:55 - Round limit reached, the warrior65 has the most troops
2022-01-04 15:45:55 - the warrior65 won the game
He was obviously just proving you right.
After all his game just got ruined for no gain but chat was ok with that
DB didnt let a different player win. In fact, DB threw away his miniscule winning chances by making that run. The only non-suiciding play that you often see in freestyle is to coordinate with the remaining players to hit the game leader. If DB wanted to win (or cause someone else to win in a justified manner), he couldve negotiated with chana and warrior to all roll against me 2 or 3 times.i-andrei wrote:So what was Dbandit doing then?Swimmerdude99 wrote:Either trolling or not getting it. Attacking with the aim to win the game is one thing, or playing with a differing strategy... Attacking to make a different player win and put you at no advantage or shot of winning is throwing and game manipulation.iAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.
Tbh, you should have reported both of them, not just the one that hit you and made you lose the game.Extreme Ways wrote:DB didnt let a different player win. In fact, DB threw away his miniscule winning chances by making that run. The only non-suiciding play that you often see in freestyle is to coordinate with the remaining players to hit the game leader. If DB wanted to win (or cause someone else to win in a justified manner), he couldve negotiated with chana and warrior to all roll against me 2 or 3 times.i-andrei wrote:So what was Dbandit doing then?Swimmerdude99 wrote:Either trolling or not getting it. Attacking with the aim to win the game is one thing, or playing with a differing strategy... Attacking to make a different player win and put you at no advantage or shot of winning is throwing and game manipulation.iAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.
See also my post above.

They both did it in the final round? If not, I understand where you're coming from. Now you just leave me confused.i-andrei wrote:Tbh, you should have reported both of them, not just the one that hit you and made you lose the game.Extreme Ways wrote:DB didnt let a different player win. In fact, DB threw away his miniscule winning chances by making that run. The only non-suiciding play that you often see in freestyle is to coordinate with the remaining players to hit the game leader. If DB wanted to win (or cause someone else to win in a justified manner), he couldve negotiated with chana and warrior to all roll against me 2 or 3 times.i-andrei wrote:So what was Dbandit doing then?Swimmerdude99 wrote:Either trolling or not getting it. Attacking with the aim to win the game is one thing, or playing with a differing strategy... Attacking to make a different player win and put you at no advantage or shot of winning is throwing and game manipulation.iAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.
See also my post above.
If you can justify Dbandit doing that before the final round, why can't you do it for someone doing it in the 20th round? Just cause he made that comment?

No he saidiAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.


Another nuanced part of this comment would be that quakers wer pacifists. So they would "not attack" and he had an issue with that, I'm guessing.chanakam2020 wrote:No he saidiAmCaffeine wrote:so because he doesnt like players who stack and wait, he stopped 1 player using this tactic from winning, and let someone else who did the same thing win anyway. smart.
2022-01-04 20:46:39 - Andrito: just hate quakers playing cc
Quakers are people who belong to a historically Protestant Christian set of denominations known formally as the Religious Society of Friends. ... They include those with evangelical, holiness, liberal, and traditional Quaker understandings of Christianity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quakers
It seems some other issue than game play I guess
I think the thing you miss here is the effect of an attack. A play that intends to throw the game is no good, another player moving to try and decrease someone changing the outcome of the game (if that is what dbandit did? I can't really tell, but that's what context is telling me). If you have played in many of these, there are a couple player known to this kind of behavior, so its sometimes courteous to block that person from affecting the game outcome.i-andrei wrote: Tbh, you should have reported both of them, not just the one that hit you and made you lose the game.
If you can justify Dbandit doing that before the final round, why can't you do it for someone doing it in the 20th round? Just cause he made that comment?
