Signature

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
firth4eva
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Signature

Post by firth4eva »

Subject>: Signature rules made clearer



<Body>:

* Suggestion Idea: Signiture rules made clearer
* Specifics:Im pretty sure im not the only one who knows what 600x150 pixels is
* Why it is needed: i have been threatened with a forum ban when i have no idea how to fix my sig

* Priority** (1-5): 4
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

Image
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

Well, as you've already been warned once before you should have an idea of what's acceptable and what isn't.
firth4eva
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Post by firth4eva »

AK_iceman wrote:Well, as you've already been warned once before you should have an idea of what's acceptable and what isn't.
i should but i dont
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Post by wicked »

:lol:
firth4eva
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Post by firth4eva »

i sorted it
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

I was confused about the sig rules before this too, and it lead to a 24 hour ban. I though that it was ONLY the picture that had to be within the limits. i had a 600x150 image in my sig and 1 line of text below it and i got banned. Turns out that text is included in the limit, which i was not aware of. can you guys please edit the page that says the sig limits and make it more clear?
Image
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

It's already quite clear.

It doesn't say "Images in your signature should be less than 600 x 150" does it? The signature obviously includes anything you put in it whether it be text, images, banners...

Just read the Guidelines a little more carefully, and if there's something you don't understand, just PM a mod and we'll explain it.

We give out 2 warnings prior to any bans for signature offenses. On the 3rd offense, you get a 24 hour forum ban. If you still don't understand the rules after 2 warnings, well....
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

AK_iceman wrote: Just read the Guidelines a little more carefully, and if there's something you don't understand, just PM a mod and we'll explain it.
You are such a hypocrite! when you gave my 24 hour forum ban a month ago I DID PM you asking for a better explanation of the rules and asking a few questions about why i was banned. I got NO explanation back. I even PMd AndyDufrense and Lackattack and got no answers from either of them!
Image
User avatar
OnlyAmbrose
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:53 pm

Post by OnlyAmbrose »

I can understand what WCA is saying though. I don't think it would be too hard to just put something like: (including text) in the rules. Would make things a whole lot clearer, and the moderators wouldn't have to dole out as many warnings.
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
firth4eva
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Post by firth4eva »

AK_iceman wrote:It's already quite clear.

It doesn't say "Images in your signature should be less than 600 x 150" does it? The signature obviously includes anything you put in it whether it be text, images, banners...

Just read the Guidelines a little more carefully, and if there's something you don't understand, just PM a mod and we'll explain it.

We give out 2 warnings prior to any bans for signature offenses. On the 3rd offense, you get a 24 hour forum ban. If you still don't understand the rules after 2 warnings, well....
it is obviously not if you have players complaining about it
User avatar
unriggable
Posts: 8036
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:49 pm

Post by unriggable »

Agree with wca and firth, I havent been banned for it though (isnt being banned kind of huge for such a measly offence?)
Image
User avatar
hecter
Posts: 14632
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
Gender: Female
Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
Contact:

Post by hecter »

unriggable wrote:Agree with wca and firth, I havent been banned for it though (isnt being banned kind of huge for such a measly offence?)
It's just a day, and they get two warnings first.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”