Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team



File an abuse report. Here are a bunch of other games in which he was abusive. I'd report him, but I've never been subjected to his abuse.Iron Maid wrote:Just wondering if CC tolerates certain behaviour.
I recently played a speed game with this guy: whoknowsGI, Game 22646755
It makes me feel sick that we are exposed to this kind of behaviour. Is this the new kind of normal? Do we really tolerate this on our site?
This way CC isn't fun anymore and it probably also explains why more and more people leave the site.

I’d say generally, this is pretty mild. From a C&A perspective it’s definitely a foe and move on situation. Cultivate the experience you want. Generally I foe people like this because like you, it’s not something I want to be overly exposed too.Iron Maid wrote:Just wondering if CC tolerates certain behaviour.
I recently played a speed game with this guy: whoknowsGI, Game 22646755
It makes me feel sick that we are exposed to this kind of behaviour. Is this the new kind of normal? Do we really tolerate this on our site?
This way CC isn't fun anymore and it probably also explains why more and more people leave the site.



I didn’t check for deadbeating tbh was just reading the chat since that seemed to be what was referenced. Rereading I do see he threatened to deadbeat.Doc_Brown wrote:What about the deadbeating? Based on the response to NSS and others, I would assume this guy should receive the full weight of C&A. I would have thought that would have been the first thing you guys would notice given that it is treated as such an egregious action on the site lately. It took about 5 minutes to flip through his games to find a bunch of other times he's deadbeated, and a whole slew of times where he threatens opponents that he'll deadbeat if they don't finish him off fast enough.
Deadbeats in:
Game 22658989
Game 22652721
Game 22651129
Game 22651122
Game 22650752
Game 22646755
Game 22645571
Game 22645525
Game 22642489
Game 22630510
Game 22628707



I’m at work and squeezing these answers in between things.Shannon Apple wrote:Wasn't that guy suspended before for this exact behaviour? Pretty sure there was a C&A thread on him and was accused of being an admitted multi of bflynn4 who did the exact same crap.


Looks like almost all of them are post that dateIcePack wrote:I’m at work and squeezing these answers in between things.Shannon Apple wrote:Wasn't that guy suspended before for this exact behaviour? Pretty sure there was a C&A thread on him and was accused of being an admitted multi of bflynn4 who did the exact same crap.
How many / if any of these games linked are post July 16, 2023?




The ban he's been given seems more in keeping with the community guidelines, which say things like 'be nice or leave'.IcePack wrote:From a C&A perspective it’s definitely a foe and move on situation.

If you read the thread, I became more educated on the situation as the discussion moved forward. Definitely was more to it then the first glance I gave it.bigtoughralf wrote:The ban he's been given seems more in keeping with the community guidelines, which say things like 'be nice or leave'.IcePack wrote:From a C&A perspective it’s definitely a foe and move on situation.


Oh, you know, "foe and move on" has it's place. There have been a few reports here where very little was said and someone got upset and reported. If someone called me an idiot, or something, I'd be like "wow, rude." But it's not a C&A case.bigtoughralf wrote:Was making more of a general comment about how the default 'foe and move on' stance is bs, rather than taking some sort of aim at you.



I don't agree with the FAMO stance for systematic chat abuse. It doesn't leave a good impression for potential new members. And people were 100% given a timeout for this type of chat abuse in the not too distant past.IcePack wrote:To be clear, this case was banned for deadbeating. The chat still is FAMO category. Only because of the deadbeat / history was this escalated.


Understood. The site is super lenient on game chat and comparatively, this was extremely mild. So not much there systematic or not. I only read the one game so maybe some of the others are worse idk.Shannon Apple wrote:I don't agree with the FAMO stance for systematic chat abuse. It doesn't leave a good impression for potential new members. And people were 100% given a timeout for this type of chat abuse in the not too distant past.IcePack wrote:To be clear, this case was banned for deadbeating. The chat still is FAMO category. Only because of the deadbeat / history was this escalated.
If we banned people w bad attitudes there’d be a lot less people on the site. I can think of a dozen + I’d immediately ban if it was simply determined on bad attitudes and that’s just based on my opinion, let alone everyone else’s opinions of bad attitudes.TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:I agree its silly he gets banned for db, I think his actitude is even worse and will affect more people than missing some speed game turns, its not that big of an issue. but imagine a new recruit having his first game with someone like this, cenrtainly would not lke to keep on playing. So better get priorities sorted.

