Neutral Player.

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:47 pm

Quick question if you have a bonus except for one territory that is owned by a neutral player do you still get the bonus?

I know i am a noob.
Thanks

Kantankerous · Post by **Kantankerous** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:52 pm

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Kantankerous wrote:noob

o ok thanks.

oVo · Post by **oVo** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:09 pm

Without occupying all the terrirories you have no bonus.

kalishnikov · Post by **kalishnikov** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:48 pm

No sir, you do not. You gotta take them all.

Night Strike · Post by **Night Strike** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:05 pm

Similar topic: does anyone else find that they seem to lose more armies to neutrals than if you had attacked another opponent with the same odds? (say, 7 v 3 or something like that where the attacker should win)

debra79 · Post by **debra79** » Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:24 pm

There's no "should win" when it comes to a game of random chance.

I don't attack neutral armies where possible, but I have found that they seem to be less resistant to attack than territories occupied by actual players.

frood · Post by **frood** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:09 am

Night Strike wrote:Similar topic: does anyone else find that they seem to lose more armies to neutrals than if you had attacked another opponent with the same odds? (say, 7 v 3 or something like that where the attacker should win)

No. I think people just tend to notice more against neutral. When you win it does not feel as if you have done as much as when attacking an opponent so loses seem bigger. And don't attack neutral unless it is absolutely needed. i.e. need one territory in a continent.

Night Strike · Post by **Night Strike** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:18 am

No. I think people just tend to notice more against neutral. When you win it does not feel as if you have done as much as when attacking an opponent so loses seem bigger. And don't attack neutral unless it is absolutely needed. i.e. need one territory in a continent.[/quote]

Generally I don't attack them except for that. But they do just seem to be downright annoying!

RobinJ · Post by **RobinJ** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:56 am

Night Strike wrote:
frood wrote:No. I think people just tend to notice more against neutral. When you win it does not feel as if you have done as much as when attacking an opponent so loses seem bigger. And don't attack neutral unless it is absolutely needed. i.e. need one territory in a continent.
Generally I don't attack them except for that. But they do just seem to be downright annoying!

Aye - they do tend to get in the way, no matter how little you attack them. You see, my mindset is that I should not be losing to them since they are not actually playing and so when I do lose I get rather pissed off[/quote]

edbeard · Post by **edbeard** » Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:01 am

What makes a man turn neutral? Lust for gold? Power? Or were you just born with a heart full of neutrality?