Moderator: Community Team
which questions? i saw you ask me what i meant by protecting myself and i answered that - i put a no lynch vote on just in case the day came to an end before i could get back online, so i wouldn't have an auto-vote against me on day 3.Ragian wrote:@sonic, what were the boxes that Charle ticked? I'm losing patience here.
@homer, why are you also ignoring my questions?

Multiple reasons mate, I did not want to get a vote placed on me next day, if Charle all of a sudden was lynched, thats one reason, not a really good one since I always can vote NL.Ragian wrote:No, I must've missed your answer. Inexplicably. I apologise.
Now, voters of Charle, why are we keen to end the day without chasing anything else? Why are half the community quiet? Why are you guys in a rush? I'd love to hear from traf, ew, and the others who are coasting.
What else could we possibly find out today? Not being a smartass just curiousRagian wrote:No, I must've missed your answer. Inexplicably. I apologise.
Now, voters of Charle, why are we keen to end the day without chasing anything else? Why are half the community quiet? Why are you guys in a rush? I'd love to hear from traf, ew, and the others who are coasting.

Loose Canon wrote:extra auto vote is a be active incentive/be inactive disincentive and I don't see how it favours one faction over another but if I'm wrong on that i'm wrong.
I've pmd jfm but I don't like auto kills or subs per se.
I like this tbhLoose Canon wrote:yes anyone who hasn't made a vote at the end of D2 will get 1vote added to the vote on them D3
If Rag is scum together with Charle I dont see this defence happening. I dont see a world in which town can lose after 1 mislynch and 1 no lynch. At least not with my role.Ragian wrote:It matters. If you're a lyncher, you might win the game if we get rid of Charle. You've typed it out, several times, as if you have a Charle spreadsheet that you're referring to.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
He did not say that but one scum to another would certainly understand it like that yes. Good comment.homer_jay wrote:i didn't see what Ragian was doing as trying to get charle off. unless someone pops up with a role that can end a day early, charle is going to be lynched. he was just saying that lynching him right away just saves the other scum from having to react to him being caught out and deprives them of a chance to slip up


Ragian didn't explicitly say that he wants to give scum a chance to talk, but seems like you agree with my assessment of what he meant.SoN!c wrote:5) Ragian:I liked his search activity but he is also trying to get Charle of the hook, well that is the impression anyways. Without Ragian Charle was lynched already. And Ragian is sowing doubts in town's heads, and he did that before when he was the 3P arsonist..; introducing uncertainty, all resulting in a lesser conviction into town's mind.
I hope his "sowing doubts" policy is just because he wants to make the max out of every day..i think he does so i have him as town for now.


