Pokemon Mafia *FINALLY OVER*

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:35 pm

sorry i didn't throw out any info, i was gone to San Diego yesterday. after reading the last couple of pages i'm really curious what dwights role could even be. we've already lost a cop, deputy, jack-of-all-trades, bus driver among others. we know you aren't doc because you said the doc would need to protect you. There aren't that many power roles left other than vigilante and if that's what you are you really haven't helped our cause w/ your night kills. ok i guess there are other weird roles, but nothing that would be supervital and require doc protection, at least that i can think of atm. or perhaps you're SK and were going to claim vigilante? i'll hold off on the vote for now until you defend yourself, but just in case

unvote

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:53 pm

well, you need to put up some pretty good evidence if you want to save yourself, a roleclaim is the last thing we want

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:26 pm

Bah. A lynch is probably better than a no lynch at this stage of the game; so despite my misgivings I'll bandwagon, as there don't seem to be any other leads.

Unvote
Vote: dwightschrute

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:33 pm

still waiting on a vote count

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:35 pm

I'm not. I'm just hoping that I accidentally hammered dwight, so this game can get moving again.

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:36 pm

Aimless wrote:I'm not. I'm just hoping that I accidentally hammered dwight, so this game can get moving again.

you shouldnt be hoping that at all.

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:37 pm

dwightschrute wrote:
Aimless wrote:I'm not. I'm just hoping that I accidentally hammered dwight, so this game can get moving again.
you shouldnt be hoping that at all.

I can't think of any drawbacks to the situation.

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:40 pm

there are 5 votes for me, and i think it is 13 to lynch?

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:41 pm

i love risk wrote:unvote vote dightschrute

way to bandwagon, you are an idiot. At least add something if you are gonna vote for someone.

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:42 pm

vote dwight
until he gives a reason not to other than the generic-cryptic 'don't kill me i'm valauble'

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:47 pm

gimpyThewonder wrote:vote dwight
until he gives a reason not to other than the generic-cryptic 'don't kill me i'm valauble'

well i think that reason applies. Koesen accused me of saying something after the mod confirmed that i was wrong. Ok i am sorry. That doesnt make me scum.

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:52 pm

dwightschrute wrote:
gimpyThewonder wrote:vote dwight
until he gives a reason not to other than the generic-cryptic 'don't kill me i'm valauble'
well i think that reason applies. Koesen accused me of saying something after the mod confirmed that i was wrong. Ok i am sorry. That doesnt make me scum.

do better

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:59 pm

gimpyThewonder wrote:
dwightschrute wrote:
gimpyThewonder wrote:vote dwight
until he gives a reason not to other than the generic-cryptic 'don't kill me i'm valauble'
well i think that reason applies. Koesen accused me of saying something after the mod confirmed that i was wrong. Ok i am sorry. That doesnt make me scum.

do better

ok i will try. Just because I got mixed up on Fircoal confirming something doesn't mean anything. I misunderstood and made a mistake. I realize we have no leads but come on, this is nothing. It was barely a mistake.

n8freeman · Post by **n8freeman** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:10 pm

can we see a rolecount?

Skoffin · Post by **Skoffin** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:17 pm

Quick question for everyone, is the only reason we're voting Dwight because we need a lynch and have nothing better to go on? If this is so, since we're going to kill someone without evidence anyway, we could so easily take out that I love Risk guy. Just like everyone else we could pick we have no evidence against him, except his stupidity, but I sooo want him out of this game :evil:

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:22 pm

For me, that is essentially the reason, yes. I have no objections against killing I love risk, though I don't know what side he's on.

Skoffin · Post by **Skoffin** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 7:40 pm

Same could be said with Dwight, but atleast this way if we make a mistake we're still getting rid of the worst player of all.

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:29 pm

Skoffin wrote: Same could be said with Dwight, but atleast this way if we make a mistake we're still getting rid of the worst player of all.

yeah exactly he just bandwagoned for no reason and he is the worst player.
VOte I love Risk

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:04 pm

dwightschrute wrote:
Skoffin wrote: Same could be said with Dwight, but atleast this way if we make a mistake we're still getting rid of the worst player of all.
yeah exactly he just bandwagoned for no reason and he is the worst player.
VOte I love Risk

this doesn't help your case

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:12 pm

we could always take out 1 of the inactives since fircoal doesn't seem willing to concede to the wishes of the players.

but dwight your claim to a power role is just too fishy for me, there really isn't anything useful left for you to claim other than vigilante and like i said before if this is the case you've hindered much more than helped so far.

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:13 pm

i'm going much more on your reactions after you had been voted than Koessen's nomination of you for lynch

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 1:38 am

vote dwight

we don't want a roleclaim, and i can see no way he can defend himself other than he already has

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:19 am

Jeez. Everyone is still bandwagoning. I'm still waiting on the mod but if he doesn't post an official vote count by the end of today(rl) I'll just vote him.

And I still want the MK's.

dwightschrute · Post by **dwightschrute** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 9:44 am

diddle wrote:vote dwight

we don't want a roleclaim, and i can see no way he can defend himself other than he already has

what was wrong with how i defended myself?

n8freeman · Post by **n8freeman** » Fri Jul 06, 2007 10:31 am

n8freeman wrote:can we see a rolecount?

woops should be votecount
:oops: