WWII Operation Iwo Jima [Quenched]

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Sun Mar 18, 2007 8:10 pm

Im sure it could be arranged for the signature to be yours on the map....I would suggest to give youor works to a map maker who you know and trust will carry out the final changes according to your wishes..

But please qwert we only live once and life is too short for all this bitterness.

Good luck in what ever you decide

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:57 am

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:32 pm

My suggestion to you would be:

1. have a break for a while

2. Ask andy to delete all topics

3. start a new and positive thread if you decide to start these maps again

4. dont be in a rush to get your maps finished (the long the wait the greater the appreciation)

5. There are many maps out there make yours so its the biggest and baddest map out

Good luck

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:35 pm

Hulmey you finaly give me good sugestion, i agree with all 5.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:05 pm

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:21 pm

Are we playing a game Qwert? I didn't know we were.

What are you trying to get at? Your topics won't be deleted. They aren't just 'your topics'.

--Andy

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:39 pm

im back,and i present new look of WWII IWO JIMA military strategic map.
Here large image of map.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:50 pm

The army circles should be centered on all the small territories on the sides of the map. Also, how do you get to Kangoky and Kama Rocks?

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm

the land looks slightly cartoony is it possible the colour could not have a gradient and just be block colour (but not quite as bright).

SOmebody may need to explain that in proper words as im sure mine are not technical

KEYOGI · Post by **KEYOGI** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:36 pm

There's a few territory lables over army shadows. I also wonder if it might look better with the grid system in the background being faded a bit more, I find it very distracting.

Are you doing away with the tunnels?

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:51 pm

AK_iceman
Moderator & Tournament Director

The army circles should be centered on all the small territories on the sides of the map. Also, how do you get to Kangoky and Kama Rocks?

well these is a large version of map,and when i resize these map to be small version,the army circle will go over borders.Maybe its better without army circle?Kangoky-i not create all rout conection yet.

boberz

the land looks slightly cartoony is it possible the colour could not have a gradient and just be block colour (but not quite as bright).

SOmebody may need to explain that in proper words as im sure mine are not technical

You mean normal colours?I put colours to be bright that can be see background.

KEYOGI
Cartography Assistant

There's a few territory lables over army shadows. I also wonder if it might look better with the grid system in the background being faded a bit more, I find it very distracting.

Are you doing away with the tunnels?

I know i just put new version,i will fix these.(i must say that i dont understand these word faded,what these mean).
No im not,tunnels not created yet.

Teya · Post by **Teya** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:05 pm

faded - make them lighter.

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:13 pm

What happened to the older version? It was much much better...

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:03 pm

old version have some mising things,like maps coordinate, and here things look more realistic.
As concerne of colours i agree with boberz,the colors must be normal without any special efect. Im very close to create military strategic map.Ofcourse only in real military map you dont have 6 diferent country colours.

WidowMakers · Post by **WidowMakers** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:17 pm

Ruben Cassar wrote:What happened to the older version? It was much much better...

I agree. The one in your sig was much better.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Sun Jul 08, 2007 7:48 pm

What kind of background is that?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:04 am

I'm a fan of the gradient.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:06 am

the old one was much better this one is kinda crappy.
especially the background with all those numbers.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:24 am

You guys is incredible,you like old version who is much bad?
very good i will present old version with these new to se diference.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:26 am

Gilligan

Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1324
Location: Conquer Club, where else?
Posted: 09 Jul 2007 00:48 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What kind of background is that?

How can people dont understand that i want to creat strategic military map,and these backgroud its original bacground of attack in iwo jima.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:45 am

here it a old version:

And new version.

DiM · Post by **DiM** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:49 am

old one is much better. :wink:

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:55 am

DiM

Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2338

Posted: 09 Jul 2007 10:49 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

old one is much better.

Can you explane why is old version better?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:58 am

Colors are easier on the eyes.