Subject: Point system adjustment concerning eliminating very low scoring players.
Body:
Suggestion: When you take someone out in a terminator who has, say, 14 points, you should get something for it rather than it saying just 'ParadiceCity9 gains 0 points'.
Specifics: I'm saying there should be a minimum number of points lost from one player, just like there's a maximum number of points, 100.
Why it is needed: It's annoying and it screwed me over in a game...and I just think you should be rewarded for beating the guy.
Priority: 5
why would that suck?
If you play a lot of opponants you should be able to rise faster, since its harder then beating a 1 vs 1.
100 points per person per game is max, this is reasonable and to prevent more cheating.meaning, in a 6 player game max 600 points, and if you win a battle royale like gibbon you get a few k points.... thats just plain great...
SirSebstar wrote:why would that suck?
If you play a lot of opponants you should be able to rise faster, since its harder then beating a 1 vs 1.
100 points per person per game is max, this is reasonable and to prevent more cheating.meaning, in a 6 player game max 600 points, and if you win a battle royale like gibbon you get a few k points.... thats just plain great...
max 500 points actually - playing a 6 player game, one of the players is yourself.
SirSebstar wrote:why would that suck?
If you play a lot of opponants you should be able to rise faster, since its harder then beating a 1 vs 1.
100 points per person per game is max, this is reasonable and to prevent more cheating.meaning, in a 6 player game max 600 points, and if you win a battle royale like gibbon you get a few k points.... thats just plain great...
max 500 points actually - playing a 6 player game, one of the players is yourself.
i should wake up now... glad i am not playing in a game, this could cost me. thanks for the pick up.