Chained Deployment

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Chained Deployment

Post by magneticgoop »

Suggestion

* Suggestion Idea: Chained Deployment

* Specifics: On a "zero" Round (before the game actually starts) each player selects a capital. Armies can only be deployed that are connected by a chain of territories to a capital or on the capital. Unchained territories are unable to be deployed on but may attack and defend. If a capital is captured the player without a capital may deploy no armies but still may attack and defend. Additionally if a player has two capitals armies may be deployed that are connected by a chain of territories to either capital or on either capital.

* Why it is needed: It would allow a new type of strategy and make shorter games.

* Priority** (1-5): 2 Not necessary but would like to see as a new game type.
Last edited by magneticgoop on Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.Image
Spritzking
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 7:19 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Spritzking »

well you come up with capitals. but you have not defined them.
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Post by magneticgoop »

Spritzking wrote:well you come up with capitals. but you have not defined them.

it is just the place that is needed to deploy armies to territories adjacent or chained to it
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.Image
User avatar
Iainarm
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 3:04 pm
Location: Mos Eisley, NY
Contact:

?

Post by Iainarm »

This would make games longer and more unfair. It would make them longer in the manner of an extra round at the beginning of the game. It would make the game unfair for those that only have a few armies that are chained. I could only ever see this as a fun addition to the game if it was a two player game on a LARGE map...
Iainarm, son of the great Iainleg, son of the great Iainhand, son of the great Iainfoot...
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Re: ?

Post by magneticgoop »

Iainarm wrote:This would make games longer and more unfair. It would make them longer in the manner of an extra round at the beginning of the game. It would make the game unfair for those that only have a few armies that are chained. I could only ever see this as a fun addition to the game if it was a two player game on a LARGE map...
ok 1 round longer but a whole new strategy
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.Image
User avatar
magneticgoop
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:03 pm
Location: Screaming at the TV as Norv Turner turns the chargers into the worst team in the NFL =(

Post by magneticgoop »

any other thoughts
Fool me once, strike one. Fool me twice, strike...three.Image
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”