I played a game in early may, having played for about a month. Nathan?? decides two and a half months later to leave the following feedback :-
Negative An all round good player but i just think he should view players by how they play on the map not what rank they have. And he should definitly not make decisions of attack based upon the players rank. As, in the game we played, he attacked me solely because i was lower ranked than the other player, even though it was clearly anyone's game. A piece of advice for "Battle-Rage" and for anyone who reads this: Risk is a game where u play to win, not, to lose the least amount of points!!!!!!!
Battle-Rage's response: Im not sure why this feedback was left in late july when the game was played in early may - i was fairly new to CC and had that same strategy employed against me at the time and i thought it was fair - since then ive learnt alot and play a fairer game across the board even when its not given back 2 me - i guess the mentallity here is across the board and could be used against players who target higher ranks for their points - if that was the case i should have left over a hundred negatives - this feedback is not called for and makes me wonder why it was left, especially now !?!? [edit] 397767 Nathan??? ( 4-0 )
2007-07-28 08:28:14.
My question is whether this neg feedack is legitimate and if there is a time frame for neg feedback - this game has long been archived and it makes me seriously wonder why a player decides to do this so long after the occasion.
Love to hear thoughts on this issue.
Battle-Rage.
