Moderator: Community Team
Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
On what account? I said that we should leave 6 alive. This is to have a higher chance of getting scum before night. It is most likely that there are two scum-caused NK's and seven would leave us saf, but there is also a strong possibility that there are going to be 3 kills since this is catastrophe. If that is the case, lynching one more will not make a difference and it will give us a higher probability of having gotten scum.kalishnikov wrote:kwanton, upon re-reading you may be right.
...what? I'm not covering him, we already had three votes on exile and I thought this day has gone long enough. I'm on the fence about Kalish, do what you like with him.mandalorian2298 wrote:I am still interested to see why is Skoffin covering Kalish so (she woke up from her letargy to post 2 votes and bail Kalish out). In fact, I am interested enough to play the lynching game against Kalish. If he is Town, I am your next lynchee.
So you found it easier to to bandwagon then to vote a suspicus character.Skoffin wrote:...what? I'm not covering him, we already had three votes on exile and I thought this day has gone long enough. I'm on the fence about Kalish, do what you like with him.mandalorian2298 wrote:I am still interested to see why is Skoffin covering Kalish so (she woke up from her letargy to post 2 votes and bail Kalish out). In fact, I am interested enough to play the lynching game against Kalish. If he is Town, I am your next lynchee.
Again I say, Kalish is scum. Lynch him now and you will see that I am right. If I am not, lynch me tommorow.Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
That's true, but I still think we should have one more lynch. Kalish seems scummy and there's really no detriment to lynching him. His power role is useless. If he is telling the truth, we won't know til the end of the day. So at night a cop investigates mandyand if he's town, then we have to assume bomb.Koesen wrote:Aren't you a bomb? Won't lynching you lead to the death of one voter, probably a townie?mandalorian2298 wrote: If I am not, lynch me tommorow.
About the fact that there may still be a doctor in the house, which is to what I assume the last statement in your post refers to.kwanton wrote:On what account? I said that we should leave 6 alive. This is to have a higher chance of getting scum before night. It is most likely that there are two scum-caused NK's and seven would leave us saf, but there is also a strong possibility that there are going to be 3 kills since this is catastrophe. If that is the case, lynching one more will not make a difference and it will give us a higher probability of having gotten scum.kalishnikov wrote:kwanton, upon re-reading you may be right.
My vote stays on kalish because his defense is a moot point because of someone's role which I am not supposed to say. Seriously if a lot of people still don't know I'm gonna just blurt it out.
Again, one problem with that argument: I'm not. I can prove it this evening. And being the bomb, would you not blow up with the lynch your suggesting and kill a lyncher?mandalorian2298 wrote:So you found it easier to to bandwagon then to vote a suspicus character.Skoffin wrote:...what? I'm not covering him, we already had three votes on exile and I thought this day has gone long enough. I'm on the fence about Kalish, do what you like with him.mandalorian2298 wrote:I am still interested to see why is Skoffin covering Kalish so (she woke up from her letargy to post 2 votes and bail Kalish out). In fact, I am interested enough to play the lynching game against Kalish. If he is Town, I am your next lynchee.
Bloody Bomb is cramping my style.kalishnikov wrote:Again, one problem with that argument: I'm not. I can prove it this evening. And being the bomb, would you not blow up with the lynch your suggesting and kill a lyncher?mandalorian2298 wrote:So you found it easier to to bandwagon then to vote a suspicus character.Skoffin wrote:...what? I'm not covering him, we already had three votes on exile and I thought this day has gone long enough. I'm on the fence about Kalish, do what you like with him.mandalorian2298 wrote:I am still interested to see why is Skoffin covering Kalish so (she woke up from her letargy to post 2 votes and bail Kalish out). In fact, I am interested enough to play the lynching game against Kalish. If he is Town, I am your next lynchee.
FOS: mandalorian You've had a certain single mindedness for a few pages, get me lynched or die trying. Lyncher/lynchee maybe, or you think I'm the Psycho and your an Agent (unlikely)? Some weird role I'm not thinking of? I think your town, but since your trying really hard to get me killed with no real evidence (and I'm on your side) I gotta say somethings amiss.
Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
I trust kalish about as far as I can shotput the planet, but you make an interesting point.Aimless wrote:I fully plan on getting kalish lynched. Tomorrow.
Right now, making another lynch is dangerous. If there are still two scum left, and two night kills, that gives us five alive with two scum come morning. If we lynch another and get the same result, it gives us four alive with two scum, game over.
So, you afraid that, should Kalish's identity be revealed before the game ends, your chances of leading us 'till the end will be endangered. Now I really want to know if I am right about Kalish. C'mon people, think for yourself instead of just following Aimless. Why does the guy who kept suggesting a massacre suddenly go pacifistic when it comes to killing Kalish. Lynch him and, if he is Town, lynch me tommorow and I will hammer myself. I really think that we can learn A LOT from this lynch.Aimless wrote:I fully plan on getting kalish lynched. Tomorrow.
Right now, making another lynch is dangerous. If there are still two scum left, and two night kills, that gives us five alive with two scum come morning. If we lynch another and get the same result, it gives us four alive with two scum, game over.
Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Wow madalorian really wants to take control of this game.mandalorian2298 wrote:So, you afraid that, should Kalish's identity be revealed before the game ends, your chances of leading us 'till the end will be endangered. Now I really want to know if I am right about Kalish. C'mon people, think for yourself instead of just following Aimless. Why does the guy who kept suggesting a massacre suddenly go pacifistic when it comes to killing Kalish. Lynch him and, if he is Town, lynch me tommorow and I will hammer myself. I really think that we can learn A LOT from this lynch.Aimless wrote:I fully plan on getting kalish lynched. Tomorrow.
Right now, making another lynch is dangerous. If there are still two scum left, and two night kills, that gives us five alive with two scum come morning. If we lynch another and get the same result, it gives us four alive with two scum, game over.
AHHHHHHHH! I said this before. 2 is the only number of kills which would screw us over with one more lynch. I'm assuming 3 is the absolute maximum with the number of people left and based on the previous night. It doesn't matter though. We have 7 alive now. If there are more than 2 NK's as you suggest then thats 4 alive max. And there would be at least 2 mafia. 2= half of four=endgame. So if there are three NK's then we're screwed already and there is no detriment to lynching one more. it will only give us the chance to catch more mafia. Of course if there is one scum we're also safe either way.kalishnikov wrote: So when you lynch me, and the scum get there 2+ NK's, that's 3 townies. What's that leave, 4 alive with 2 scum? And that's assuming only 2 kills, there may be more.
