don't bother it'll just waste time and you'll prob get the same resultqwert wrote:I will put poll to be sure that colours ok.
Moderator: Cartographers
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
It's just that there are no such things on the East Front map. So it also looks a bit awkward having it on the West Fron one? Or?qwert wrote:these mine style of work,i can to put more darken.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.
I think the flags there keeping his style alive and the theme of the 2 maps will compliment each other.alstergren wrote:It's just that there are no such things on the East Front map. So it also looks a bit awkward having it on the West Fron one? Or?qwert wrote:these mine style of work,i can to put more darken.
Anyways, it was just something I thought of. It's up to you.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Ninja-Town wrote:This is just an idea, but I think it would be really cool to put Switzerland in and give it a decent bonus to occupy it, with only one or two borders tops.
But the trick would be that when it starts off, Switzerland has like 12 neutral armies or something similar. I mean that is what the neutral player color is there for right?
This would accomplisht two things,
1- It would include Switzerland in the map
2- It could possibly stay neutral the whole game just like in the war. It would be kind of historical in a way.
What do you guys think?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
they don't deserve to play a partColeman wrote:We could put Switzerland with 50 neutrals and no bonus. Then it would be historically accurate because probably nobody would attack it.
Sorry, that's a joke. People from that country are almost more full of themselves then us Americans, I don't want it on the map.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Or you could just put the whole world in with a neutral of 50....Coleman wrote:We could put Switzerland with 50 neutrals and no bonus. Then it would be historically accurate because probably nobody would attack it.
Sorry, that's a joke. People from that country are almost more full of themselves then us Americans, I don't want it on the map.
hes no worring he had problems with his last map so he's rather get it sorted just now rather than having this map run into 150 pages like his last one.tim02 wrote:I think the colours are great why are you worrying so much?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

If you think the Swiss did nothing on the western front you are wrong.jako wrote:personally i think map is fine now, the colours are better than before, the swiss should not be a part of the map since they werent a part of the western front to begin with, adn im really excited for when this comes out.
to be honest, the eastern front map is kinda dull after playing 2 games on it. the western front looks to be a lot more interesting like it was in the real war.
alstergrenIt's just that there are no such things on the East Front map. So it also looks a bit awkward having it on the West Fron one? Or?qwert wrote:
these mine style of work,i can to put more darken.
Anyways, it was just something I thought of. It's up to you.
I dont want to someon after 20 pages say"you colours is not good"tim02
I think the colours are great why are you worrying so much?
Teya wrote:In your eastern from map, you have the 3 star territories. Are you doing the same thing in this map? will there be 3 stars?
If you are having the 3 stars, you are better off having 39 territories, not the 42 that keyogi suggested.qwert wrote:Yes they are,but first people must look terittory colours and when majority agree with colours,then i can go to next step.