"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
cawck mongler wrote:So whoever gets this right is the new king of the forums or something.
t^3+t^2-3t-9 --------------- t+3
Everynight my dad tells me to do this shit, and everynight he gets pissed off because I don't know how, so tell me. DONT ASK ME WHY I HAVE TO DO THIS. The t^2 and stuff means 2 over t, and its t^3+t^2 etc. over t+3, so divide.
3/t + 2/t - 3t - 9
5/t - 3t -9
5/t - 3t^2/t -9t/t
(-3t^2 - 9t - 5) all over (/) t
and thats the final answer, you cant simplify any more
cawck mongler wrote:So whoever gets this right is the new king of the forums or something.
t^3+t^2-3t-9 --------------- t+3
Everynight my dad tells me to do this shit, and everynight he gets pissed off because I don't know how, so tell me. DONT ASK ME WHY I HAVE TO DO THIS. The t^2 and stuff means 2 over t, and its t^3+t^2 etc. over t+3, so divide.
Titanic wrote:My answer is t^2-2t+3 remainder -18. Btw, the answer will never be t=something, because there is no equvalent to the original question.
=0. They graphed the equation and found the solution that way (all intersections on the t-axis). I found the other factor of the equation, which is what I've been told to provide as a correct answer. As far as I can tell, it's not possible to simplify t^2-2t+3 any more, so that should be acceptable.
Titanic wrote:My answer is t^2-2t+3 remainder -18. Btw, the answer will never be t=something, because there is no equvalent to the original question.
=0. They graphed the equation and found the solution that way (all intersections on the t-axis). I found the other factor of the equation, which is what I've been told to provide as a correct answer. As far as I can tell, it's not possible to simplify t^2-2t+3 any more, so that should be acceptable.
Norse just went a different way about it.
Whatever you say, your majesty
Im the queen to your king, and dont you forget that!
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Titanic wrote:My answer is t^2-2t+3 remainder -18. Btw, the answer will never be t=something, because there is no equvalent to the original question.
=0. They graphed the equation and found the solution that way (all intersections on the t-axis). I found the other factor of the equation, which is what I've been told to provide as a correct answer. As far as I can tell, it's not possible to simplify t^2-2t+3 any more, so that should be acceptable.
Norse just went a different way about it.
Whatever you say, your majesty
Im the queen to your king, and dont you forget that!
Considering who throned me, I think I'll have to decline It's all yours, Norse.
salvadevinemasse wrote:Umm, I failed pre-algebra sorry cant help you with your home work!
-_- We already took care of it. I never took Pre-Algebra... what class is that?
College course that I failed twice. Its before algebra
Did you never get credit for it in high school?
I didn't go to high school... home schooled.. Only thing in this world that I suck at is math basically
I bet your significant other would beg to differ
Damn! You got me! Actually its funny you should say that when I was thinking that when I wrote it.. But I was trying not to be perverted! Hes the one good at math, I'm better in English!
"angel by heart....mistress dressed sexy by night....and by day..just a cool person i guess" By BlueReaper
cawck mongler wrote:Your only option is to quit and become an anti-American Nazi that plays risk.