Should Cheaters be band forever?

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:19 pm

Well?

Or should they just be allowed to "upgrade" and stay?

More info here.

Ronaldinho · Post by **Ronaldinho** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:44 pm

They should be aloud to stay for a fee of $70, this way i can buy shares into this site and get rich :wink:

alster · Post by **alster** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 11:57 pm

Yes. They should all be put in a band and be forced to sing INXS songs.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:11 am

I see OUStorm and his multi voted.

Good show.

johnnyrotten · Post by **johnnyrotten** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:33 am

alstergren wrote:Yes. They should all be put in a band and be forced to sing INXS songs.

Couldn't have put it better myself alster. Maybe Duran Duran as well?

lackattack · Post by **lackattack** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:19 am

We do let multis come back if they upgrade to Premium Membership, and if more than one of the banned accounts re-activates that way, the must have different billing information.

Once you have been busted as a multi, your account is flagged as such, and we take extra measures to ensure that you do not continue to have multiple accounts.

Most busted multis never come back, but some pay the fine, suffer a battered reputation, and in our experience, mostly stay clean.

SprCobra · Post by **SprCobra** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:11 am

lackattack wrote:We do let multis come back if they upgrade to Premium Membership, and if more than one of the banned accounts re-activates that way, the must have different billing information.

If more than one account pays premium they are really desperate for points in internet risk

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:56 am

lackattack wrote:We do let multis come back if they upgrade to Premium Membership, and if more than one of the banned accounts re-activates that way, the must have different billing information.

Once you have been busted as a multi, your account is flagged as such, and we take extra measures to ensure that you do not continue to have multiple accounts.

Most busted multis never come back, but some pay the fine, suffer a battered reputation, and in our experience, mostly stay clean.

So why are they allowed to finish playing their existing games at the expense of honest players?

Search: Map CCU. Players D.IsleRealBrown/OUStormyPetrel/Jigglypuff©

SprCobra · Post by **SprCobra** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:58 am

Because lack doenst like messing with games in progress

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:05 pm

So lack has the power to cancel games?

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:06 pm

The best way is to ban them for however long then let them come back if they pay a fee of at least $50 and no premium.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:08 pm

OK, what the HELL does paying a fee have to do with our rights as players?

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:14 pm

Since when has this been about the right of players? I thought this was about cheaters, who as far as I am concerned don't get the same rights as regular players.

SprCobra · Post by **SprCobra** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:43 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:OK, what the HELL does paying a fee have to do with our rights as players?

They will be very discouraged to mkae another multi and lack <3 money

Nappy Bone Apart · Post by **Nappy Bone Apart** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 12:56 pm

I say let them stay, but require them to pay for premium membership on ALL their accounts.Thus, you get caught with 5 accounts, you pay $100. then only allow 1 to be played.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:11 pm

strike wolf wrote:Since when has this been about the right of players? I thought this was about cheaters, who as far as I am concerned don't get the same rights as regular players.

We'll apparently they get more rights. They were just smart enough to cheat.

My point is why do we care about what they pay if they're going to continue to cheat?

Can lack cancel games that have mutlis/collusion taking place?

SprCobra · Post by **SprCobra** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 1:25 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:
strike wolf wrote:Since when has this been about the right of players? I thought this was about cheaters, who as far as I am concerned don't get the same rights as regular players.

We'll apparently they get more rights. They were just smart enough to cheat.

My point is why do we care about what they pay if they're going to continue to cheat?

Can lack cancel games that have mutlis/collusion taking place?

He probaly can buts its alot of trouble to do,could be abused and he doesnt like messing with games in progress

strike wolf · Post by **strike wolf** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:41 pm

D.IsleRealBrown wrote:
strike wolf wrote:Since when has this been about the right of players? I thought this was about cheaters, who as far as I am concerned don't get the same rights as regular players.

We'll apparently they get more rights. They were just smart enough to cheat.

No there the ones stupid enough to get caught cheating unlike me and my...woops. Just ignore that.

boogiesadda · Post by **boogiesadda** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:40 pm

Cheaters ruin the game for everyone and should be permanently banned from the site no if's and's or but's about it.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:54 pm

i think they should be able to stay as permium as long next to their name in their profile and everywhere it shows their name to say they were a convicted multi

ex: if i was a busted multi that bought premium, lack or someone could make my name "wcaclimbing (multibust)" and make it so i cant delete the multi part. then everyone would know you were a multi and it would still be good punishment.

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:04 am

I think if someone makes an honest mistake of course they should get a second chance.

I'm talking about real cheaters that abuse the rules and don't stop colluding with one another.

Just a suggestion. :wink:

spring1 · Post by **spring1** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:09 am

*discreetly throws away INXS and Duran Duran CD's*

Gerazan · Post by **Gerazan** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:24 pm

They should have honey poured on their privates and be staked to the ground over a bed of fireants

D.IsleRealBrown · Post by **D.IsleRealBrown** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:33 pm

Gerazan wrote:They should have honey poured on their privates and be staked to the ground over a bed of fireants

I agree, but I'd settle for a permanent ban.

This is the current game I'm in where OUS and his multi are about to take me out after colluding the entire game. I advised the other players but they're just now realizing what's going on. I told them to just put this POS on ignore after this and I'd advise the rest of you to do the same...if lack still refuses to get rid of him.

Gerazan · Post by **Gerazan** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:39 pm

Id really like the option of turning off chat when making a room

Should Cheaters be band forever?

Should cheaters be allowed to stay.

Should Cheaters be band forever?