Braveheart Mafia Game thread- MAFIA WIN!!!

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:11 am

got tonkaed wrote:
jnd94 wrote:The Scots wake up, and start a head count to see who is still here, and who will scout the land ahead.12..13....14? We have everyone! No one has died!

With 14 Alive it takes 8 to lynch!
did the new role thing happen for some people or is that just on the way still? (directed toward the mod)

It happened, if you werent pm'ed then you are the same.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:11 am

got tonkaed wrote:
jnd94 wrote:The Scots wake up, and start a head count to see who is still here, and who will scout the land ahead.12..13....14? We have everyone! No one has died!

With 14 Alive it takes 8 to lynch!
did the new role thing happen for some people or is that just on the way still? (directed toward the mod)

But dont worry, everyone's roles can change, its just a matter of who dies.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:14 am

vote skittles

eh im blaiming you cause seems like its your vote which really helps turn things toward a lynch.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:15 am

Vote Count

1-Skittles! (got tonkaed)
1-ga7 (Serbia)

With 14 alive it takes 8 to Lynch!!

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:16 am

also for what its worth...id be willing to bet i know why the scum failed last night....and it probably wasnt a doc.

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:17 am

FOS Serbia for having a weird power that makes him able to reserve votes at night. Scum!

I didn't follow this well, I'll reread later in the day.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:18 am

Bad first day, good first night.

If you have anything to share, got tonkaed, I'd love to hear it, though I suspect you want to keep it to yourself.

freezie · Post by **freezie** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:20 am

Koesen wrote:Bad first day, good first night.

If you have anything to share, got tonkaed, I'd love to hear it, though I suspect you want to keep it to yourself.

If you haven't understood already, you don't deserve to know.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:23 am

I have several theories, none of them confirmed with absolute certainty. If that makes you dislike me, fair enough.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:25 am

Koesen wrote:I have several theories, none of them confirmed with absolute certainty. If that makes you dislike me, fair enough.

to keep it as simple as possible....it was my formal request to make sure some day vig doesnt commit some egregious sin by killing me.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:38 am

Oh well, I'm sure I'll see the light sooner or later.

In the meantime, I Vote Huckleberryhound for dropping the hammer on Fircoal without giving him a chance to claim.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:45 am

Thats a good point, he really should have waited for a role claim.

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:47 am

Vote huck to turn up the heat.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:47 am

Koesen wrote:Oh well, I'm sure I'll see the light sooner or later.

In the meantime, I Vote Huckleberryhound for dropping the hammer on Fircoal without giving him a chance to claim.

I warned him beforehand in a post, that i was going to do that, so he had more than enough time to claim (considering he's a prolific poster).

It is funny how 8 people voted, but now there is a blamegame going on. This is why i will now......

vote got_tonkad

For picking on skittles. If fircoal was scum, it would be a different scenario, it's not skittle's fault fircoal acted like scum.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:51 am

Huck did you skim? Read tonka's posts again and you should understand.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:52 am

1. I agree Fircoal could have done a better job himself.

2. I know you warned him, but that doesn't mean it's okay to drop the hammer like that. Of course there is an end to patience, but I think you could have waited longer than you did, warning or not.

3. Yes, other people voted him too, but dropping the hammer comes with a special responsibility, and you, I repeat, dropped it irresponsibly.

4. I'm not sure that you are scum, but so little happened yesterday that you are my best lead for now.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:54 am

The fact that you defended skittles is very interesting though

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:54 am

nagerous wrote:The fact that you defended skittles is very interesting though huck

EBWOP

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:56 am

nagerous wrote:Huck did you skim? Read tonka's posts again and you should understand.

Got_tonkaed only posted half a dozen times, and his first post of any consequence was to VOTE FIRCOAL

fos nagerous

My vote stands for now.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:57 am

I'm talking about his day 2 posts.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:59 am

We have a power outage, so I'm on a public computer at the library trying to repair the chaos that life suddenly has become, and I have the unpleasant feeling I'm missing something really obvious...

Maybe later, when things calm down again. In the meantime, I have work to do, and if you don't see me back today, it's because of having been thrown back into the stone age. Don't even have running water

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 8:59 am

nagerous wrote:I'm talking about his day 2 posts.

I read his day 2 posts, it's not as if he posted a copy of "War and Peace".

Maybe you are skimming my posts ?

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:05 am

Its not up to me to spell it out for tonka but you'll understand there was good reason behind his vote for skittles at this stage.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:25 am

nagerous wrote:Its not up to me to spell it out for tonka but you'll understand there was good reason behind his vote for skittles at this stage.

I do understand the idea behind his vote, believe me.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:30 am

If you understood the reasoning behind his vote then why vote for him, thats very suspicious.