Vote Huck for the relatively quick hammer on Fircoal as he has made false claims like that plenty of times. You would think he would learn to stop claiming to be scum, but so far no good.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Huck for the relatively quick hammer on Fircoal as he has made false claims like that plenty of times. You would think he would learn to stop claiming to be scum, but so far no good.
Technically Serbia dropped the hammer, because i clearly stated that i would if someone else voted.
Ok, i have to look tomorrow, because i'm kinda drunk right now but......
According to Jnd's post, i never dropped the hammer, a second vote sealed the deal. Now, either i miscalculated yesterday, and my vote was only the 7th vote....or it wouldn'tve mattered if i voted or not because there was 9 votes.
I will be doing a recount in the morning, but i sure would like to know why my vote is so important if there is clearly a second vote in play ?
Huckleberryhound wrote:Ok, i have to look tomorrow, because i'm kinda drunk right now but......
According to Jnd's post, i never dropped the hammer, a second vote sealed the deal. Now, either i miscalculated yesterday, and my vote was only the 7th vote....or it wouldn'tve mattered if i voted or not because there was 9 votes.
I will be doing a recount in the morning, but i sure would like to know why my vote is so important if there is clearly a second vote in play ?
THAT'S my man!!!!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Huckleberryhound wrote:Ok, i have to look tomorrow, because i'm kinda drunk right now but......
According to Jnd's post, i never dropped the hammer, a second vote sealed the deal. Now, either i miscalculated yesterday, and my vote was only the 7th vote....or it wouldn'tve mattered if i voted or not because there was 9 votes.
I will be doing a recount in the morning, but i sure would like to know why my vote is so important if there is clearly a second vote in play ?
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Huck for the relatively quick hammer on Fircoal as he has made false claims like that plenty of times. You would think he would learn to stop claiming to be scum, but so far no good.
Technically Serbia dropped the hammer, because i clearly stated that i would if someone else voted.
My posts are testament to that.
That's when we wait for a claim, sir. I give reasonable amounts of time (Ex.: an hour) before hammering while waiting for a claim. Not when someone else votes.
Mmh I would never have expected to find so many leads after such a lousy day 1. I can't believe you lynched Fir for that reason in so few pages too (I know, I would have probably done the same. But a replacement has the right to be bitchy )
I agree about HBH acting stupid/scummy with his hammer. Though I am more suspicious of Serbia for his general behavior along the wagon. Kinda low profile, and taking a chance at the end. I feel I'm still missing something though, will have to check back later.
Well, after being dealt such a terrible blow on day one, I'm glad to see we all made it through the night. As for Huck, yes he hammered but we would have jumped on anyone in this game who was responsible for dropping the hammer. Once the main character dies(Especially on day 1) we all try to blame the one who sealed his fate. But, I don't think that just because Huck was the final vote, that he's automatically scum. I'm not sure who to vote for at this point. I'll check back tomorrow and decide.
Huckleberryhound wrote:I just cvhecked....Fircoal; got 9 votes.
So it would seem to me that my vote hammered without my knowing it because someone else put up a mysterious second vote, which I had no way of knowing. Which leads me to point the finger at Huck. Huck comes on and says he'll hammer if someone else votes. So I voted, thinking there was one more vote to be had, when now it looks like there was already the mysterious vote in play. It's possible Huck has the hidden vote, and only posted what he did to get someone else to hammer, and shift the blame to whoever voted just before him to put it at -1 (which turned out to be me). So, FOS Huck
Huckleberryhound wrote:Dude. Why would i've voted if my second vote already sealed the deal.....DUH
I wouldn't be surprised if the person with two votes simply has his first vote count double. In other words, without a first vote, there wouldn't be a second one.
Huckleberryhound wrote:Dude. Why would i've voted if my second vote already sealed the deal.....DUH
I wouldn't be surprised if the person with two votes simply has his first vote count double. In other words, without a first vote, there wouldn't be a second one.
Unless you have to pm the second vote.
And to you Huck, you'd vote anyway to cover yourself, so that you can go back and blame me and the mysterious second vote. I'm not voting you on this yet, just a theory I'm floating. Obviously the second vote belongs to someone...
Huckleberryhound wrote:Dude. Why would i've voted if my second vote already sealed the deal.....DUH
I wouldn't be surprised if the person with two votes simply has his first vote count double. In other words, without a first vote, there wouldn't be a second one.
Unless you have to pm the second vote.
And to you Huck, you'd vote anyway to cover yourself, so that you can go back and blame me and the mysterious second vote. I'm not voting you on this yet, just a theory I'm floating. Obviously the second vote belongs to someone...
Look, seriously. Think about this for a second....Regardless of Jnd's hideous vote accounting, why would i double vote when one vote dropped the hammer ?
(I know, I would have probably done the same. But a replacement has the right to be bitchy 
I have too many as it is.
