Ok, if TWO wasn't a replacement, he's definitely the most submarining of all. Sorry guys, I guess I misread.
Unkill Kill TWO
Moderator: Community Team
It's like i'm hitting my head on a wall here .....wait.ga7 wrote:Dude, I know you're a replacement, I was talking about TWO being a replacement himself. So, are you claiming 3rd party?
unkill kill Ga7Huckleberryhound wrote:It's like i'm hitting my head on a wall here .....wait.ga7 wrote:Dude, I know you're a replacement, I was talking about TWO being a replacement himself. So, are you claiming 3rd party?
![]()
There, i feel better now.
unvote vote Ga7
For trying to make me role claim, and defending Anarkist a bit too much.
But mainly for trying to push me into a roleclaim.
I would have to agree. Early game, lynching inactives is a good tactic (that is, if no better target present themselves) while late game this isn't such a good idea, since the inactives provide a buffer between the townies and mafia.kwanton wrote:Hrm with fircoal and MG's deaths this means that there are less union/confed than I had originally thought......Usually I am against lynching the inactives but in a game like this I think we should try to lower the amount of people so we're in less of a state of disarray.
kill TWO
I'm leaning more towards the setup of a recruiter on both union and confed sides a NK power for each (i.e. the assassin that was killed) and a native american faction that is either a group of mafia or an SK. Just speculation on my part and I could very well be wrong but I'm starting to learn more and more abut the setup.......
I think this needs more opinion of, and is in the realms of possibiliy. Why? Because when the game started I thought of a similar thing. In fact, I thought of a brilliant(My ego requires me to use that word) strategy that might very well keep me alive for a while(well, maybe) however I've been unwell, busy and didn't think I'd be able to pull it off at the present time anyways. I don't think half my posts lately even make sense heh. Er wait, where was I going with this? Oh yeah, probably shouldn't trust AK, or atleast come back to this later.Russianfire8371 wrote: How can we trust AK? Sure he's roleclaimed, but what if he was expecting to be protected. I mean think about it. If you were a Union and he told you that he was on your team, wouldnt you protect him? Will he be protected from now on? What if he's not really a union member but a confed or a native american?
FOS AK How can we trust you?


LSU Tiger Josh wrote:MagneticGoop 2.0 will be replacing TWO
Vote count coming up

