Grounds For Neg Feed?

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:52 pm

In game 694197 a player is threatening one of his allies with negative feedback. Trying to use it as a way of keeping control in the game. Is this allowed? Also, not to mention, yellow players deliberate bribary attempt with the blue player...do you think that this is acceptable behaviour? Is this grounds for a Neg Feed?

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:00 pm

It's not against the rules, however its not very fair behavior.

Leave negative.

Mucko · Post by **Mucko** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:40 am

DaGip wrote:In game 694197 a player is threatening one of his allies with negative feedback.... Also, not to mention, yellow players deliberate bribary attempt with the blue player...

You seem to "forget" that the blue was a declared ally to the yellow (me), and therefore what you call a "bribery" is rather to be called "share of the reward".

The threat with the negative feedback is also very obvious, and such a feedback must be written for the blue, since he broke the alliance with a SNEAK ATTACK.

Finally, as you appear to be an advocate of ThePlague, you've raised a heavy suspect in me: is he your friend, or... your

multiaccount??

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:26 am

hehe.. Mucko, you need to steady-up and take stock. have a look around at the rules, have a look at other threads here... and just stop saying silly stuff.

no no's:

- Don't offer someone points, by throwing a subsequent game, if they help you win an existing one.

- Don't accuse someone of being a multi when someone pulls you up on the above action (it tends to irritate a tad)

- Don't play poker with an inebriated dwarf

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:09 am

I wouldn't say it is.. I know lots of people who leave neg feedback for breaking alliances, at least he gives a warning.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:49 am

Rev, you don't think attempting to bribe one of the opposition by agreeing to throw a future 2 man game to give points away is grounds for a Neg?
Then, when questioned on it he accused 2 of the opposition of being mulits!

hehe the fella is obviously still learning the ropes and it's quite funny due to it's audacity.... not sure i agree with you though.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:51 am

Must read 2 thumbs up.... its boring at first, but when you get to the end...it will all be worth it

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:06 am

the second half really is worth a read .. the piece where Mucko compares the game to the betrayal of Jesus is particularly funny.

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:21 pm

now, on top of the current situation, it seems Mucko still wants to keep me involved in the game, even though I was elliminated a while ago. He has now not only accused me of a multi account, but has took the liberty to private message me to taunt me even further. Welcome to my ignore list, ButtCrako!

From: Mucko
To: DaGip
Posted: 10 Sep 2007 07:09
Subject: You, too, find me guilty?!?
I'm really badly surprised that even you find me guilty!
Oh yes, you may have a bad opinion about me, but only because I removed you from the game... after you've rejected my proposal for truce (I often offer such proposals) in the form "stay in Italy".

It seems that it has been long before, maybe you even don't remember when it was last time you've heard the words: "Fair" and "Thankful". My attempt to reward an ally, to be fair and thaknful to him, you find to be ridiculous and cheating?!?

It seems that your capitalist world is ruled by greed, and GREED ONLY, so you can't understand a man such as myself, who is not greedy???

Conversing in GameChat is one thing, but Private Messaging a player to taunt him (especially one that is not even in the game anymore) is totally immature, and I am afraid that my opinion of you will never change, Muckho.

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:32 pm

DaGip wrote:
Words from Mucko in PMS to DaGip Edit
It seems that your capitalist world is ruled by greed, and GREED ONLY, so you can't understand a man such as myself, who is not greedy???

hehe so those capitalist devils won't let you reward an individual for services rendered... those ideological fiends!

So let's recap:
1. you try to bribe someone to help you win the points in a game.
2. you think you are likely the next messiah
3. everyone is wrong except you

I think you should go into politics!

wacicha · Post by **wacicha** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 2:31 pm

Well he does have a dead prez as his Avatar

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:50 am

Wacicha, Jimi wasn't talking about me...he is talking about Mucko. He is posting my private message I got from Mucko. And why would you call yourself Wacicha? Do you even know what that means?

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:14 am

no dude mucko's avatar looks just like reagan.

Sir Titus · Post by **Sir Titus** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:17 am

Mucko's a funny guy. Anyone would compares himself to Jesus is a "special" guy....

Brings the Metallica song "Sanitarium" to mind....

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:27 am

DaGip wrote:Wacicha, Jimi wasn't talking about me...he is talking about Mucko. He is posting my private message I got from Mucko. And why would you call yourself Wacicha? Do you even know what that means?

Yeap DaG, I reckon Wac knows.

Sorry my fault for sloppy posting; it looked like they were your words. .. and your Ronnie picture lent itself to the next part. (as Rev said, Muckos picture could be an ex prez anyway)

wacicha · Post by **wacicha** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:43 am

yes I do

Wah see cha = white man
wah see CHA = white trash

I was born on an indian reservation. it is the name I grew up with.

mom was indian dad was french canadian

jiminski · Post by **jiminski** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:36 am

Explains some of your humility Wac!

DaGip will tell you the root of his question i am sure.

negoeien · Post by **negoeien** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:54 am

Stop using my short name!! Thx!

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:08 am

Cool! My Mom was Dakota Sioux and my Dad German American. I was just wondering if you knew the meaning of Wacicha and weren't some ignorant white guy that picked it up and thought it would be "cool" to use as a nick. My GreatGrandma would use it like a swear word when she was mad at someone. And yes, I guess Mucko's avatar does resemble Ronald Reagan a bit...lol. I wish Ronnie was prez right now and not KingGeorge!

wacicha · Post by **wacicha** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:29 am

wah see CHA pronunciation is the dirtiest word in the sioux language. I believe it was used as a swear word at me most of the time. with the fights i was in for that name I wear it proudly!!!

mom was indian which pissed off the white people and made me indian

dad was french canadian which pissed off the indian's and made me white

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:02 pm

wacicha wrote:wah see CHA pronunciation is the dirtiest word in the sioux language. I believe it was used as a swear word at me most of the time. with the fights i was in for that name I wear it proudly!!!

mom was indian which pissed off the white people and made me indian

dad was french canadian which pissed off the indian's and made me white

I know exactly the feeling...Did you know that Crazy Horse also was nicknamed that when he was young?

wacicha · Post by **wacicha** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:38 pm

yes and would say am related to him and 1 other chief. But as small as the gene pool is or was that is not hard to be.

killerkid037 · Post by **killerkid037** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:05 am

General grounds for negative feedback:

Inappropriate language, behaviour etc. in game chat.
Breaking fair truces/allies.
Threatening others.
Inappropriate use of the feedback system --That includes threatening others with negative feedback.

alster · Post by **alster** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:44 am

killerkid037 wrote:General grounds for negative feedback:

Inappropriate language, behaviour etc. in game chat.
Breaking fair truces/allies.
Threatening others.
Inappropriate use of the feedback system --That includes threatening others with negative feedback.

I think you could add one more:

- Returning the favour (i.e. if someone gives you a neg. feedback, that constitutes a ground for giving one in return).

LOL. But seriously.

A general ground for handing out a neg. feedback is if someone enters into an alliance. There is no such thing as a fair truce/alliance. That's for the weak and inapt and it disrupts the game.

cleveridea · Post by **cleveridea** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:44 pm

jiminski wrote:- Don't play poker with an inebriated dwarf

Perhaps lack should add this to the rules FAQ. Seriously, someone could get hurt otherwise.

Grounds For Neg Feed?

Grounds For Neg Feed?

Re: Grounds For Neg Feed?