Civil War Day 7. UNION WINS!!!!! Thanks 2 ALL 4 PLAYING

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:39 pm

Meh, I didn't bother posting it but the same thing happened before after the death of Mcgoop, at this point I think Dustn is a simple townie.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:42 pm

The case against dustn seems rather stretched...... I don't think I'll vote him unless he actually does something scummy.....

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:45 pm

magneticgoop wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:could we have some validation of the "boring role" complaint?
I Guess It could be because Im a townie thats only goal is to make it to the end of the game, But Im not sure.
koesen Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:32
dustn64 Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:51

only 20 mins later which suggests he is frequently reading the thread but purposely submarining. vote dustn

Thats not even a good reason. I could of been on a coma woke up said "hey let me check my mafia games, OOOH NO!!111!! I got some votes I better say something"

ga7 wrote:Meh, I didn't bother posting it but the same thing happened before after the death of Mcgoop, at this point I think Dustn is a simple townie.

Thank you and exactly

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 10:02 pm

dustn64 wrote:
magneticgoop wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:could we have some validation of the "boring role" complaint?
I Guess It could be because Im a townie thats only goal is to make it to the end of the game, But Im not sure.
koesen Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:32
dustn64 Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:51

only 20 mins later which suggests he is frequently reading the thread but purposely submarining. vote dustn
Thats not even a good reason. I could of been on a coma woke up said "hey let me check my mafia games, OOOH NO!!111!! I got some votes I better say something"

ga7 wrote:Meh, I didn't bother posting it but the same thing happened before after the death of Mcgoop, at this point I think Dustn is a simple townie.
Thank you and exactly

oops kill dustn

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:20 pm

dustn64 wrote:
magneticgoop wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
Hitman079 wrote:could we have some validation of the "boring role" complaint?
I Guess It could be because Im a townie thats only goal is to make it to the end of the game, But Im not sure.
koesen Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:32
dustn64 Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:51

only 20 mins later which suggests he is frequently reading the thread but purposely submarining. vote dustn
Thats not even a good reason. I could of been on a coma woke up said "hey let me check my mafia games, OOOH NO!!111!! I got some votes I better say something"

If this mafia game really means that much to you than you really need to get out more.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:09 am

Hitman079 wrote:could we have some validation of the "boring role" complaint?

If this means "show me the complaint", then the quickest response is to point you to LSU's blacklist in the first post. Duday is the guy that Dustn replaced. The actual complaint was made sometime during Day One, I think, but I have to get my daughter to school, so I can't dig it up right now. He definitely said he thought it was boring, though.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:12 am

dustn64 wrote:Thats not even a good reason. I could of been on a coma woke up said "hey let me check my mafia games, OOOH NO!!111!! I got some votes I better say something"

Don't be offended, but I think the submarining theory is more likely than the coma one (if not, congrats

)

You post twice in fifteen pages. Then somebody points out you're submarining and twenty minutes later you respond? That is submarining, and submarining is suspicious.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:06 am

I don't know why I am suddenly attracting votes. All I was pointing out was that devoting all our attention to a SK is pointless. It's like the entire town in a traditional game abandoning the search for scum just to devote all their energies to the much smaller threat of the SK.

Dustn's submarining (and it was submarining, not just inattention; 20mins between accusation and responce is not purely due to chance), while scummy to say the least (submarining is always scummy) is not really enough to modivate me, at this point, into voting. Most likely, he's just a plain, boring townie in a game where declaring Neutrality is instant suicide. Of course, he could always just be a submarining powerrole, but duday's claim of 'Boring role' portrays this in a rather unlikely light.

I've been a bit busy lately but I'll post a more extensive summary of my thoughts tomorrow (yay, weekend!)

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:40 pm

Koesen wrote:unkill

I'm not sure what to think of nagerous, so I'm leaving him aside for now. The Neutrino-theory is interesting, but doesn't convince me to vote yet. I am therefore going to introfuce a brand new lead and

kill dustn

His predecessor complained of a 'boring role'. Dustn replaced him and voiced no such complaints, but resorted to submarining instead. I went back 15 pages, and all I could find was one rather unimportant question to the mod and one unmotivated bandwagon kill.

I think perhaps his predecessor joined hoping to actually fight in the civil war, then found out he got stuck with a third party role and Dustn now is lying low in the hopes to avoid attention and limiting his actions to whatever his nightrole allows him. He might be one of our native killers.

That theory works for me, at least we wont kill another union

kill dustin

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:41 pm

Sigh.

Kill: Dustn

Before we end another day with a no lynch.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:45 pm

Syzygy wrote:Sigh.

Kill: Dustn

Before we end another day with a no lynch.

I don't think we ended a day with no lynch....According to the first page Nes/ML was the day 1 lynch and MM10 was the day 2 lynch.

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:49 pm

kwanton wrote:
Syzygy wrote:Sigh.

Kill: Dustn

Before we end another day with a no lynch.

I don't think we ended a day with no lynch....According to the first page Nes/ML was the day 1 lynch and MM10 was the day 2 lynch.

Hmm? Crap, sorry. I'm confusing the Jedi Mafia with this one. Anyway, I'll keep my vote.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:53 pm

There wasn't a day without a lynch in that one either.....

Maybe you were fishing for a reason to vote for dustn but it's probably just a slip up. Either way I'll give you a pointless FOS syzygy

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:54 pm

I still think Neutrino slipped up and makes a better target. His defense doesn't make much sense either as it's the only scum faction we can search for on the contrary. Anyway, I'll wait for a vote count to see what to do about Dustn.

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:56 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
Koesen wrote:unkill

I'm not sure what to think of nagerous, so I'm leaving him aside for now. The Neutrino-theory is interesting, but doesn't convince me to vote yet. I am therefore going to introfuce a brand new lead and

kill dustn

His predecessor complained of a 'boring role'. Dustn replaced him and voiced no such complaints, but resorted to submarining instead. I went back 15 pages, and all I could find was one rather unimportant question to the mod and one unmotivated bandwagon kill.

I think perhaps his predecessor joined hoping to actually fight in the civil war, then found out he got stuck with a third party role and Dustn now is lying low in the hopes to avoid attention and limiting his actions to whatever his nightrole allows him. He might be one of our native killers.
That theory works for me, at least we wont kill another union

kill dustin

Huck, did you just role-claim as Union? Gutsy call this late in the game, with the score like it is. And by gutsy I mean kinda dumb Kill: Huckleberryhound

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:58 pm

works for me. Kill Huck cuz i never liked him anyway.

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:00 pm

UNKILL, KILL:Huck

They have an agreeable point regarding your roleclaim.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:02 pm

UNKILL, KILL HUCK
All aboard the 3:10 to Yuma bandwagon!

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:02 pm

Huck did a stupid move, but IMO you did one even more stupid. You do realize that at this point everyone not confed would want them dead instead of an union?

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:05 pm

Ill hop on that train! Thats extreamly stupid to do huck since about 3 or 4 more times the amount of unions are dead than confeds. Im not sure that even he can be that dumb. I think that its a false claim. But thats scummy to so UNKILL KILL DUSTIN

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:06 pm

I'll have to bandwagon on this one...

Unkill

Kill: Huckelberry

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:07 pm

dominationnation wrote:Ill hop on that train! Thats extreamly stupid to do huck since about 3 or 4 more times the amount of unions are dead than confeds. Im not sure that even he can be that dumb. I think that its a false claim. But thats scummy to so UNKILL KILL DUSTIN

Whoops. Wrong name there. UNKILL KILL HUCK

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:12 pm

dominationnation wrote:
dominationnation wrote:Ill hop on that train! Thats extreamly stupid to do huck since about 3 or 4 more times the amount of unions are dead than confeds. Im not sure that even he can be that dumb. I think that its a false claim. But thats scummy to so UNKILL KILL DUSTIN
Whoops. Wrong name there. UNKILL KILL HUCK

FOOL! T'WAS NOT IN BOLD!

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:13 pm

Normally, I wouldn't trust that claim cuz it'd be stupid to out yourself when your side is at such a numbers disadvantage. I'd hold back in case he was a jester of some sort. But it's huck and I don't think he wouldn't claim in this situation so

kill huck

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:14 pm

MM you're next cuz ur starting to annoy me