Civil War Day 7. UNION WINS!!!!! Thanks 2 ALL 4 PLAYING

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:15 pm

kwanton wrote:MM you're next cuz ur starting to annoy me

You're not the first.

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:22 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
dominationnation wrote:
dominationnation wrote:Ill hop on that train! Thats extreamly stupid to do huck since about 3 or 4 more times the amount of unions are dead than confeds. Im not sure that even he can be that dumb. I think that its a false claim. But thats scummy to so UNKILL KILL DUSTIN
Whoops. Wrong name there. UNKILL KILL HUCK
FOOL! T'WAS NOT IN BOLD!

Grahh. I can do this. UNKILL KILL HUCK

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:22 pm

I never roleclaimed, are you guys on drugs ????

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:27 pm

You didn't intentionally roleclaim, but the way you said "at least we won't kill another Union" kinda insinuates that you don't want to kill Union, which would only make sense if you were wearing a navy blue uniform

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:27 pm

spurgistan wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:
Koesen wrote:unkill

I'm not sure what to think of nagerous, so I'm leaving him aside for now. The Neutrino-theory is interesting, but doesn't convince me to vote yet. I am therefore going to introfuce a brand new lead and

kill dustn

His predecessor complained of a 'boring role'. Dustn replaced him and voiced no such complaints, but resorted to submarining instead. I went back 15 pages, and all I could find was one rather unimportant question to the mod and one unmotivated bandwagon kill.

I think perhaps his predecessor joined hoping to actually fight in the civil war, then found out he got stuck with a third party role and Dustn now is lying low in the hopes to avoid attention and limiting his actions to whatever his nightrole allows him. He might be one of our native killers.
That theory works for me, at least we wont kill another union

kill dustin
Huck, did you just role-claim as Union? Gutsy call this late in the game, with the score like it is. And by gutsy I mean kinda dumb Kill: Huckleberryhound

sounds like you inadvertantly did.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:31 pm

spurgistan wrote:You didn't intentionally roleclaim, but the way you said "at least we won't kill another Union" kinda insinuates that you don't want to kill Union, which would only make sense if you were wearing a navy blue uniform

ergo - you ae confed, as is everyone who votes for me, yes ?

Your argument, not mine.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:46 pm

Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest

If you want me to , just ask.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 2:51 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest

If you want me to , just ask.

I could care less if you can't be nightkilled... That's why we're lynching ya, genius.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:35 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
Huckleberryhound wrote:Considering how dumb the sides are here, and the fact that i can't be nightkilled, i don't mind roleclaiming in the slightest

If you want me to , just ask.
I could care less if you can't be nightkilled... That's why we're lynching ya, genius.

So, your motives are not that of considering me union,or confed, but just because you want to.....unkill kill anarkistdream

For his very scummy reason to lynch.

dominationnation · Post by **dominationnation** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:38 pm

you obviosly dont understand Huck. You are being a retard. re read the last few pages and then post.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:39 pm

I don't understand your ENORMOUS leap of logic...

We are killing you because you are a Union soldier. However, why would I care about your roleclaim? You'll die before it ever becomes night.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:42 pm

dominationnation wrote:you obviosly dont understand Huck. You are being a retard. re read the last few pages and then post.

So, i am a retard....why exactly ?

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:43 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't understand your ENORMOUS leap of logic...

We are killing you because you are a Union soldier. However, why would I care about your roleclaim? You'll die before it ever becomes night.

You are so sure that i am a union soldier....would you like to bet money on it ?

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:44 pm

Huckleberryhound wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:I don't understand your ENORMOUS leap of logic...

We are killing you because you are a Union soldier. However, why would I care about your roleclaim? You'll die before it ever becomes night.

You are so sure that i am a union soldier....would you like to bet money on it ?

Sure... Let's bet...

ga7 · Post by **ga7** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:54 pm

You guys are morons. No 3rd party in their right mind would follow this wagon, and you won't get a majority with just the confeds. Add to that the fact there's still a day-vig on union's side and the confed day-vig died, and that you'll probably have to suffer the consequences of your all-out action tonight, this was really an awful move, regardless of what Huck really is. Way to waste an advantage

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:54 pm

nice a bandwagon

kill huck

unkill huck but i wont be joining

i think dustn or nuetrino would be a better kill

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:01 pm

The1exile wrote:works for me. Kill Huck cuz i never liked him anyway.

Cool, coz i think you're a dick

spurgistan · Post by **spurgistan** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:40 pm

OK Huck, feel free to explain why you said you didn't want to lynch Union soldiers.

Huckleberryhound · Post by **Huckleberryhound** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:22 pm

spurgistan wrote:OK Huck, feel free to explain why you said you didn't want to lynch Union soldiers.

It was an attempt at humour. Kosean said dustin was probably a native killer, and i said "at least we wont kill another union". Unfortunately the sarcastic smiley doesn't work, and obviously there are people who just want to vote for me....but there has been accusation and counter accusation every time someone mentions one side. If you think what i said is actually worth worth lynching someone for, then i should be waay down your list broseph

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:24 pm

I'm going to have to agree with Ga7 here (even though he's trying to get me killed). Confederates are never going to make up sufficient numbers by themselves and the resounding Confederate lead insures no neutral faction is going to join them.

The Confederates have just exposed themselves and most likely are going to recieve exactly what they did to the Union yesterday.

Ga7, why are you trying to get me killed? It was to you(r former body) that my quoted comment was directed. You were the one in favour of an all out war against the forces of Neutrality. All I was tryng to do was put it back in perspective: a lone or small group of Serial Killers can never compete with the sheer amout of damage one of the fully formed factions can do

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:27 pm

Neutrino can you not understand what you are saying. Most of us are in these huge factions and we declare ourselves as the pro-towners in this game and the others in this game as the scum, particularly the SKs or collective mafia formed from natives. By saying that we should be trying to lynch confederates and unions because of their "formed powers" implies that you are not one of us and saying we should ignore the natives is a defence of the natives, something which is not needed considering they are taking out members of the confederacy/union at will.

magneticgoop · Post by **magneticgoop** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:39 pm

wow major FOS to everyone who band wagoned. regardless of alignment huck should not be jumped on that quickly by any one. almost nobody gave a good reason to vote huck. really all of you that think the confederacy is big enough to control who gets lynched are seriosly mistaken as i am sure the union and all 3rd parties outnumber you substantially. this game still has several people with NK abilities and anyone that is anti confed with half a brain will kill any of the first people to jump on hound. not to mention the big battle is coming tonight and chances are 1 in 7 are gonna die.

Koesen · Post by **Koesen** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:45 pm

I agree that the Huck bandwagon is a mistake based on an overanalysis of a remark that can mean a lot of things. This is the kind of stuff we do on Day One.

One intersting bit came from it, though, and that's the selfproclaimed Union member Anarkistsdream voting for someone he accuses of being Union too. What gives?

Fos Anark

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:55 pm

Wow you guys make a good point..... Need to rethink things apparently.....

unkill

gimpyThewonder · Post by **gimpyThewonder** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 6:00 pm

sorry, i've been out of the loop. Reading the last few pages i see a bunch of people bandwagoning onto Huck for what he calls a slip-up. And then there are people who step up and say that he shouldn't be killed for it. i'm going to kill AD because he still seems to be a wolf in sheeps clothing to me.