FOS Anark Been suspicious of you most of the game, truth be known. I'm not ready to switch votes yet, but if we get close to hammering you, I'll switch up.
I'd prefer Huck first as I believe he's more suspicious with his unkillable claim, but well I'll switch my vote to whoever has the most at next vote count.
kill huck there was a union roleblocker so it makes sense there to be a confed roleblocker so AD's claim is legible, plus his claim of stonewall jackson is also legible. huck on the other hand has made some scummy claims here.
nagerous wrote:kill huck there was a union roleblocker so it makes sense there to be a confed roleblocker so AD's claim is legible, plus his claim of stonewall jackson is also legible. huck on the other hand has made some scummy claims here.
I agree with ya on this one nag.
kill huck
I usually have a rule of "lynch all liars" but his role fits and the fact that no one has counterclaimed such a prominent role like stonewall makes me believe AD.
The bullet-proof claim is probably the most convenient claim for scum besides bomb (this is on top of his scummy behavior) so even if he full claims I probably won't believe him.
Sorry for the inactivity lately; a few things came up and they had to be crushed completly.
Anyway, I do support the Lynch All Liers guide. If they've lied once, what makes you think they're telling the truth this time?
Of course, in AD's case, the lack of counter-claim is what makes me believe him. Jackson was pretty major and so the chance of someone getting him is close to 100%.
Huck, of course, is another matter entirely. All the changing of sides allows the LaL guide to be applicable and he dosen't have anything to make me feel we shouldn't apply these guides, like AD does.
Anyway, Kill: Huck.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...