Anarkistsdream wrote:If you told me you are Davis and you weren't countered, I'd unvote and struggle to keep you.
But do you see my dilema....with people like ga7 on the prowl, naming a side would kill me for sure.
We still outnumber them... And I am a roleblocker... I blocked ga7 last night. I will continue to. And anybody else on our side may be able to help. *shrug*
Basically, would you rather be lynched or NKed?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you told me you are Davis and you weren't countered, I'd unvote and struggle to keep you.
But do you see my dilema....with people like ga7 on the prowl, naming a side would kill me for sure.
We still outnumber them... And I am a roleblocker... I blocked ga7 last night. I will continue to. And anybody else on our side may be able to help. *shrug*
LSU wrote:4. All ‘votes’ and ‘unvotes’ must be in bold and state "KILL". If they are not, they will not be tallied. (I.E. KILL: Guybrush Threepwood)
** If you vote to kill two or more times consecutively without an unvote in between them, then the first kill vote will be the one that gets tallied. If I can't read the vote aka small font or weird color it will NOT count. Amunitions are in short supply. You may not vote to kill or unkill more 6 times in a day.*
Last edited by Huckleberryhound on Wed Sep 19, 2007 2:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
LSU wrote:4. All ‘votes’ and ‘unvotes’ must be in bold and state "KILL". If they are not, they will not be tallied. (I.E. KILL: Guybrush Threepwood)
** If you vote to kill two or more times consecutively without an unvote in between them, then the first kill vote will be the one that gets tallied. If I can't read the vote aka small font or weird color it will NOT count. Amunitions are in short supply. You may not vote to kill or unkill more 6 times in a day.*
WHY did you edit??????????
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
LSU wrote:4. All ‘votes’ and ‘unvotes’ must be in bold and state "KILL". If they are not, they will not be tallied. (I.E. KILL: Guybrush Threepwood)
** If you vote to kill two or more times consecutively without an unvote in between them, then the first kill vote will be the one that gets tallied. If I can't read the vote aka small font or weird color it will NOT count. Amunitions are in short supply. You may not vote to kill or unkill more 6 times in a day.*
Huckleberryhound wrote:I don't think at this stage that anyone gives a crap which side i'm on.
I do... Union or Confed?
I don't care whether you do or not bro. My only ace left is that i know for a fact that the faction don't know which person is it's president.
thats a pretty dumb move, you're not a survivor your objective is to help your side win and if you get lynched and is Davis I will be madddd.
The tide is against me, you all seem defiant in your drive to lynch me....it's the only card i have left.
I think that you wouldve made an attempt to get your side to help you out rather than say that your "a president" and that "the tide is against you". The mystery you shroud yourself in is making me question your validity. If you were the union president, you wouldve (shouldve?) played smarter. If you were the confed president, you have a shit load of people that can protect you.
As for AD, you claim to have blocked ga7s action when no actions were taken last night.
as for Huck, im most positive that i did kill you after i screwed up my kill with Spurg but im going to trust you for now
spurgistan wrote:Now that Huck's dead, I feel like it's time to concentrate on the fact that we still have unaligned killing roles run amok here.
Cant confirm his death until a vote count has been conducted. As for SKs? Im not sure who to look towards. My FOS would lie with AD. He voted for Huck, and then unkilled him after being told that he is not really dead yet. Why? I'm assuming that he's screwing around with his roleclaims staying with the strongest people to win. If there's a chance that anyone could be a president, i dont think its smart to just kill him without knowing which side he's on. AD could be out to kill him and then side with the other faction (depending whether the union or confed president died) saying that he was lying when he stated first or second roleclaim.
Im just theorizing, but i still think that AD's roleclaim can be trusted