Moderator: Community Team
whenever i vote the msg disspears for a day then comes back, i assume he uses that somehowqeee1 wrote:I think lack tracks links out from the mygames page, and just assumes if you visit the site that you've voted. Can't hurt to post here also though I suppose.garbagge59 wrote:sorry if someone asked before, but i didn't want to read 27 pages worth of postings:
how do we know who voted? do we just post here after we voted because if that's it, i just voted.
I.e. if you clicked the link lack probably knows and will be organizing your game shortly.
Stop complaining about the dice. If you won 2 games because of dice and lost 2 games because of dice then it is fair. You are averaging 50%. If I had a win rate of 50% I wouldn't be complaining.uzless wrote:Maybe instead of trying to force your customers to win contests for you, you could create a game alert button that people can submit games to you for review to prove the extreme steakyness of the dice. Each game should be fair, not based on an average of 10, 100 or 1000 games as the dice analyzer shows.
Last 2 games I blew my opponent away with a 75% win percentage and then lost the next 2 with a 75% loss percentage.
Sure, after 4 games the dice results even out but NOT IN THE SAME GAME. Strategy is irrelevant as it stands.
Comments from my last games:
2007-09-19 18:47:43 - Alexinho: lol! i can't believe the luck i'm having
2007-09-19 18:47:49 - Alexinho: i'm sorry, it's not fair
2007-09-18 17:04:18 - tygre1975: I cant believe you dice. I have had bad before, but this may take the cake
2007-09-18 15:20:21 - uzless: i apologize...all i'm rolling now are 4,5,6 and you are getting 123...it's not fair
Looks like i'll stay away from this site for another few months and give it a shot later to see if this is addressed properly. Too bad, because this is a good site otherwise.
GreecePwns wrote:WOW has 4 votes...does that make us 1,500x better than WOW? I think so
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Sample size is too small. Read up on randomness. http://www.random.org is where the site gets it's dice randomness from.uzless wrote:Sure, after 4 games the dice results even out but NOT IN THE SAME GAME. Strategy is irrelevant as it stands.
Most likely by whoever posted in this thread.Finbus wrote:How will you know who voted??? I don't see how you can know who clicked the link and voted. I voted BTW.
Who clicked the link is easily traced. Lack doesn't actually know if when you went to the site you voted for CC, but he's assuming out of the goodness of his heart.Finbus wrote:How will you know who voted??? I don't see how you can know who clicked the link and voted..
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
hmmm kind of thought of publicity!sully800 wrote:Just publicity for the site I would imagine.chessplaya wrote:I just want to know what does it benefit u ? more players , u get paid for winning ???? etc. etc.
And it was a challenge that CC took on and handled admirably
EDIT: Grand Strategy is up to 5 votes!! They're closing in fast!