The Asylum Mafia (Fircoal wins!)

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:47 pm

i'm gonna unvote, we've already lost too many town today, and i'd rather not lose another, wicked could prove to be useful, if shes telling the truth

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:47 pm

side note, the mod has been so generous as to tell me my role is indeed chaplain, not champlain.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:49 pm

wicked wrote:side note, the mod has been so generous as to tell me my role is indeed chaplain, not champlain.

i highly doubt a religiouis person would be scum, but you never know, i've seen enough films to know that theres always a bent vicar

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:49 pm

Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:50 pm

wicked wrote:So Minister, how does that make me scum? I'm not following. did you get a note saying you were blocked? I went back and checked my PM and it said my action had no effect, it didn't say I was blocked, I never claimed I was blocked. I never assumed I was blocked, I assumed my action had no effect b/c Ank was town and therefore couldn't be converted to town.

1) I unvoted, but screwed it up. UNVOTE.
2) Are you saying there are no roleblockers? How else would four of us not be able to use our night actions?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:51 pm

I think we should look at who was online when Kozy was killed.

Minister, curious, have you already claimed a role, or just said you were blocked?

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:52 pm

wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.

That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.

Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.

Two roleblockers, garunteed.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:52 pm

First, let's get a little talk going...

Both day kills have obviously got to be someone who is intently watching the game... More than likely participating.

Wicked, the smartest thing you could do as scum is kill Koesen... Obviously NO ONE is stupid enough to do that, which would immediately pull you out of suspicion... You and I have spoken enough about reverse psychology in this game... You are very good at it, and it makes me still doubt you.

Minister... You are also fairly good at this game. Why should I believe that you are not the day killer?

As for everyone else, what do you all think?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:52 pm

Minister, please stop putting words in my mouth. I never said there were no roleblockers! can you answer my questions? were you specifically told you were blocked, or did your PM say your action had no effect?

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:52 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.

Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.

Two roleblockers, garunteed.

I am referring to night two... Not one.

Sierra_Leon · Post by **Sierra_Leon** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:54 pm

Whoever is responsible for the day-kill has to be online, right?

Users browsing this forum: cena-rules, kwanton, Minister Masket, Sierra_Leon

Also online: exile, AD, diddle

Also posted after koesen's claim: mandy, talapus, nag

It's not a guarantee, because the killer could've logged out immediately after sending in his day-kill, but it's a good chance the killer is one of these.

I need some more time to think about lynching wicked. The role she claimed sounds pretty important for the town. I would be impressed if she thought that up, unless ofcourse she's actually the scum-counterpart that converts neutral insanes to scummy insanes. It's a tough call.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:55 pm

How would it be that a plain townie like Koesen could get the role right the first time and not the second?

Are we assuming there is a player that can not ROLEBLOCK, but TRUTHBLOCK???

How would they target someone?

All I can say is that Koesen has been proven to be correct, so how is he wrong about Wicked?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:56 pm

Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.

Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.

Two roleblockers, garunteed.

I did mention that before, in my first post of the day, with my role info in it. And I never said I "couldn't use night action". That MAY be an explanation, but not necessarily.

Minister, have you claimed your role already and if so, can you tell me what you are? I'm not asking you to claim if you haven't already! You've revealed you were blocked, so I'm assuming you claimed already and I missed it in my catchup. And can you tell me if your PM said you were blocked??? or how was it phrased?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:58 pm

Sierra_Leon wrote:I need some more time to think about lynching wicked. The role she claimed sounds pretty important for the town. I would be impressed if she thought that up, unless ofcourse she's actually the scum-counterpart that converts neutral insanes to scummy insanes. It's a tough call.

Then why would I have the town's win condition??

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:59 pm

wicked wrote:I think we should look at who was online when Kozy was killed.

Minister, curious, have you already claimed a role, or just said you were blocked?

I never claimed, I said I was power role (I am). And my action didn't word because "it just didn't work", according to GT.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:01 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:How would it be that a plain townie like Koesen could get the role right the first time and not the second?

Are we assuming there is a player that can not ROLEBLOCK, but TRUTHBLOCK???

How would they target someone?

All I can say is that Koesen has been proven to be correct, so how is he wrong about Wicked?

There are a few reasons.... some cop roles get random reads, sometimes right, sometimes wrong. Someone could've framed me last night, so any investigation would've turned up insane. I don't have time to investigate wikiscum, but i'm sure there's other reasons as well.

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:02 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
wicked wrote:Minister, are you talking about Night 1 or 2? I am referring to Night 1.
That helps, you didn't mentioned that before.

Night 1: You and AD couldn't use night actions.
Night 2: Me and koesen couldn't use our night actions.

Two roleblockers, garunteed.
I am referring to night two... Not one.

Oh, so which night was Koesen referring to?

Minister Masket · Post by **Minister Masket** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:09 pm

VOTE Sierra Leon
Being shady all round, not posting much.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:09 pm

wicked wrote:
Sierra_Leon wrote:I need some more time to think about lynching wicked. The role she claimed sounds pretty important for the town. I would be impressed if she thought that up, unless ofcourse she's actually the scum-counterpart that converts neutral insanes to scummy insanes. It's a tough call.

Then why would I have the town's win condition??

You don't have MY win condition, and I'm on the towns side.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:20 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
wicked wrote:Then why would I have the town's win condition??
You don't have MY win condition, and I'm on the towns side.

And by that I take it you're not actually town, although pro-town?

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:23 pm

wicked wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
wicked wrote:Then why would I have the town's win condition??
You don't have MY win condition, and I'm on the towns side.
And by that I take it you're not actually town, although pro-town?

Indeed.

So far, Jake and Koesen are the only two with "Town" after their name once they have died... So, unless someone else claims "Town", you won't be able to confirm your win condition... Or, more accurately, WE can't xconfirm your win condition.

kwanton · Post by **kwanton** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:26 pm

wicked wrote:I am no mafia noob... I would NOT kill someone going after me!! Kozy had already come out with what he found out, what reason would I have to off him now???? None!

And? So what? No one said you were the one who killed him. That doesn't clear you though. I wouldn't doubt that there is a third party day killer. The fact that koesen died is not really a defense for you wicked...

Sierra_Leon · Post by **Sierra_Leon** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:27 pm

I browsed through days 1 and 2 again. I found freezie and mandy attacking koesen on day 1. As Freezie also voted koesen and I had a bad feeling about mandy since his post after talapus died, I find mandy more suspicious out of those two. I also found minister masket very sure that cena should be lynched the next day. Now that we know cena was town, that's also pretty suspicious. Oh and thanks for the vote minister, but I think I post often enough.

So FOS mandy and FOS Minister.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:36 pm

am i alive? cuz my names not in the title

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:39 pm

no jake

Dead:
25. fireedud (drug abuser insane) lynched day 1
20. xgsuperstar (suicidal patient insane) suicide night1
9. firth4eva (psychiatrist insane) lynched day 2
12. ga7 (unknown role) killed night 2
13. kalish (assistant director - insane) killed night 2
21. jake (cook -roleblocker - town) killed night 2
16. koesen (director - town) killed day 3
8. cena (mortician -reviver- town) died day 3