now THAT book was terrible. almost the entire thing is vernacular dialogue you'll be struggling to understand. and c'mon firth, that was a joke from the simpsons [BUSTED]
i read the book for english two years ago...it was ok when i first read it; i don't think you'll like it atm. but when you look back to it after some time it was actually a pretty good book. watch out for themes, you might need to write an essay on them
Koronna wrote:i read the book for english two years ago...it was ok when i first read it; i don't think you'll like it atm. but when you look back to it after some time it was actually a pretty good book. watch out for themes, you might need to write an essay on them
Actually, our essay is going to be about parent/child relationships.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
It's an excellent book. Not exactly page turning suspense, but a great look at society from a child's eyes. There should be alot to write about with Atticus Finch's realtionship with Jem and Scout. There are plenty of other parent-child relationships mentioned to compare and contrast.
No offense (well, maybe a little), but the ignorance of youth here at CC is astounding.
Both "To Kill A Mockingbird" & "Huck Finn" are both outstanding examples of quality literature; and film as well (as far as TKAM is concerned).
It's amazing how clueless the current "scholastic generation" can be at times.
Like I said........ no offense........
"Give me a woman who loves beer and I will conquer the world." -Kaiser Wilhelm II
That is a very good book.
In my opinion, the movie was just as good as the book.
Gregory Peck does a great job.
I don't know the name of the girl who played Scout, but she was very good as well.
I can't believe there are so many of you that hated the book.
Iz Man wrote:No offense (well, maybe a little), but the ignorance of youth here at CC is astounding.
Both "To Kill A Mockingbird" & "Huck Finn" are both outstanding examples of quality literature; and film as well (as far as TKAM is concerned).
It's amazing how clueless the current "scholastic generation" can be at times.
Like I said........ no offense........
I don't think that the book is not a good examples of mankind but the interest I had in the book plummted once I got through the first page. I enjoy other book that have symbols for mankind such as Lord of the Flies. But TKAM didn't suit my taste.
I don't think that the book is not a good examples of mankind but the interest I had in the book plummted once I got through the first page. I enjoy other book that have symbols for mankind such as Lord of the Flies. But TKAM didn't suit my taste.
I really don't understand how you can say that. Did you even finish reading the book?
firth4eva wrote:i got pissed off when i reached the end and found out it had nothing about killing birds in
The title of "To Kill a Mockingbird" has very little literal connection to the plot, but it carries a great deal of symbolic weight in the book. In this story of innocents destroyed by evil, the “mockingbird” comes to represent the idea of innocence. Thus, to kill a mockingbird is to destroy innocence.