Moderator: Community Team
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Better would be to have your giant army on Western Australia or something. People might expect a giant army on Indonesia, but if they don't see it they'll go in assuming that the rest of the region is weak. Then BAM! 50 armies. Raped with a sandpaper condom.duday53 wrote: And it would be good strategy, say you have oceania put one army on siam and all of your armies on indonesia. Then if it is escalating and they come to eliminate you...they get past siam and think you are weak and boom your main army is there to next turn destroy their main armies. May not work though.
Trueinsomniacdude wrote:Better would be to have your giant army on Western Australia or something. People might expect a giant army on Indonesia, but if they don't see it they'll go in assuming that the rest of the region is weak. Then BAM! 50 armies. Raped with a sandpaper condom.duday53 wrote: And it would be good strategy, say you have oceania put one army on siam and all of your armies on indonesia. Then if it is escalating and they come to eliminate you...they get past siam and think you are weak and boom your main army is there to next turn destroy their main armies. May not work though.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
MeDeFe wrote:There are 114 players out to get you, and you don't know where 97% of them are. Imagine the thrill!
In that large of a field -- it wouldn't matter because you can only attack countries that are adjacent to you. Those countries would be revealed to you anyway. What others are doing on the other side of the map has no relevance because even if they were visible, what are you gonna do ? hyperspace there?MeDeFe wrote:There are 114 players out to get you, and you don't know where 97% of them are. Imagine the thrill!