I'm not saying I have contributed a shit load, I've tried but have been able to point anything out before someone else did. But I damn sure have been active.
Avron wrote:I'm not saying I have contributed a shit load, I've tried but have been able to point anything out before someone else did. But I damn sure have been active.
But don't you get the method to my madness?
People get upset that I point them out, so they begin to post more... The ones that don't.. well, they really ARE submarining, and should be replaced or killed.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
got tonkaed wrote:ok, i tried to do a cursory read over the game quickly to get some impressions.
I think the most suspicious people out there at the moment are nagerous (for doing something dumb) and avron (for most likely being scum). Kalish also for what its worth seems to say things that dont make a whole lot of sense, specifically right around the 2nd day to night phase.
Nagerous seems to bring up the idea that lets start getting rid of some inactives (which hey makes a lot of sense) but he does so when it wouldnt be a terrible time to push some other possiblities. Seeing as how we get some kind of confirmation on ga7 we are in a spot to start looking at some of riggables info and maybe move forward. Then we get the campaign to end the day from nag.
Avron earlier made a comment that nagerous jumped on for sounding scummy, but didnt pursue it any further. It was the type of thing that would be entirely pointless to say as a pro town charcter.
Also cena eventually is going to have to be either taken with a grain of salt or some how disregarded, as he has too much of a sway over what we know, and if he is being used, as is suggested by the one scene, we will be in bad shape down the line. Clearly the information is good for now, but eventually it may not serve us well.
I don't think thats a case, If you actually read what I said I made a point that diddle wasn't actually contributing but just making joke posts and it wasn't helping the town so I put a vote this way. I never pushed for a bandwagon or an attempt to end the day, everyone just happened to bandwagon on my word, so I feel your attack on me is unwarranted.
nagerous wrote:
I don't think thats a case, If you actually read what I said I made a point that diddle wasn't actually contributing but just making joke posts and it wasn't helping the town so I put a vote this way. I never pushed for a bandwagon or an attempt to end the day, everyone just happened to bandwagon on my word, so I feel your attack on me is unwarranted.
it was simply a very useless post at the time you made it. It was bust halfway down the page from exile clearing ga7 and only a few posts away from sierra being accused.
Conviently you come up with the idea to kill of an inactive then, when certainly we probably would have begun to talk about sierra if you did not.
And yes, I sometimes tend to say things that make no sense at all. My brain goes all weird on me and I think I make sense and I don't. Dunno why it happens, but it's a usual thing, sorry.
I've gotta re-read a bit again before I finish this post, so I wonder why I'm still typing? I could just click Back and do it, but instead type, type, type.
the pro town hero makes good points, plus pushing the idea of ga7's guilt after I'd cleared him was pretty damn suspicious too.
That was obvious skimming, I was just analysing ga and I forgot he had been cleared. Why would it be a scum tactic for me to say the guy that had just been cleared was scummy, thats illogical. Investigate me tonight please and you will discover why this bandwagon must not continue.
nagerous wrote:
I don't think thats a case, If you actually read what I said I made a point that diddle wasn't actually contributing but just making joke posts and it wasn't helping the town so I put a vote this way. I never pushed for a bandwagon or an attempt to end the day, everyone just happened to bandwagon on my word, so I feel your attack on me is unwarranted.
it was simply a very useless post at the time you made it. It was bust halfway down the page from exile clearing ga7 and only a few posts away from sierra being accused.
Conviently you come up with the idea to kill of an inactive then, when certainly we probably would have begun to talk about sierra if you did not.
I think you are misinterpreting the truth, I read back and there was no decent chat on Sierra Leon. All people were saying was he did well as an SK in athlakata and I actually tried to steer the conversation away from the spamming game diddle and iliad were playing by highlighting the actual fact that diddle wasn't actually contributing anything interesting.
it is most certainly possible that there may be nothing there at all....however i still feel discussion may have ensued that probably will not at the moment, so you are on notice for now.