Moderator: Community Team
Jesus f*ck you're a moron. HEY GUESS WHAT YOU FUCKING RETARD, WW1/2 WAS EUROPEANS VS. OTHER EUROPEANS, SO EUROPE WOULDN'T HAVE LOST EITHER FUCKING WAY, US only helped the side that would eventually win both times, and stole the glory away from Russia and the triple entente.Harijan wrote:to elaborate the hijacking issue.
I claimed that my pet peeve is europe's public disdain for America while relying on the American military to protect europe all through the cold war, really ever since WW2. It irritates me that Europe has no problem ripping on the single strongest military force that the world has ever known when that military force has saved Europe over and over again.
I do not suppor the Iraq war.
I only listen to Bush when I need a laugh.
I believe that the current American foreign policy is highly destructive and dangerous.
But I live here, it is my responsibility to have opinions about that shit. I am the one who has to get rid of Bush type thinking. Until the EU or any individual european country has something to offer besides critism, STFU and go work on fixing the problem.
I ASSUME YOU ARE TO RETARDED TO EVEN REALISE THAT RUSSIA DID MOST OF THE FIGHTING, AND AMERIKKKAS CONTRIBUTIONS WERE REDUNDANTHarijan wrote:OMG I thought CM was killed by his parents. My life was so much brighter about 2 minutes ago.
Cm, you are right, I am operating under the assumption that Europe was better off beating Hitler than Hitler beating the rest of Europe.
It is true I have no basis for this assumption other than common fucking sense.
Please go try and f*ck the family dog again so that your parents take away computer privileged for a few more weeks.
cawk, SHUT UP! Russia and Europe both recieved large amounts of supplies, weapons, and materials from the US. So I suggest you shut your Socialist trap now.cawck mongler wrote:I ASSUME YOU ARE TO RETARDED TO EVEN REALISE THAT RUSSIA DID MOST OF THE FIGHTING, AND AMERIKKKAS CONTRIBUTIONS WERE REDUNDANTHarijan wrote:OMG I thought CM was killed by his parents. My life was so much brighter about 2 minutes ago.
Cm, you are right, I am operating under the assumption that Europe was better off beating Hitler than Hitler beating the rest of Europe.
It is true I have no basis for this assumption other than common fucking sense.
Please go try and f*ck the family dog again so that your parents take away computer privileged for a few more weeks.
no need to get snippyYeah, and if you actually think Nazism wouldn't have fallen, you are sadly mistaken my retarded friend.
err...hm. Eisenhower supported it, so what? the rest of Europe were just very pissed off at the Nazis for well, bombing their homes, shooting their husbands and sons before occupation and requisitioning businesses. The question is not about eugenics but resistance. Supplantation ofthe whole of a people by the Germans could not have been sustained...Eugenics was big back then, Eisenhower even supported it; it was only after the war that everyone started associating it with the people who kicked their asses and thought it was bad.
USSR is not the subject of debate. I said Nazism would not last in Europe.Everyone hated the USSR, and it took them 50 years to get free of them, and unlike the USSR, Germany actually had an economy that wasn't shit. And since everyone who wasn't a Nazi was shot, I can see the 3rd Reich lasting a long time.
Yeah right, if people cared so much about their freedom then how did Russia conquer half of Europe and not have to worry about it for 50 years?Napoleon Ier wrote:no need to get snippyYeah, and if you actually think Nazism wouldn't have fallen, you are sadly mistaken my retarded friend.
err...hm. Eisenhower supported it, so what? the rest of Europe were just very pissed off at the Nazis for well, bombing their homes, shooting their husbands and sons before occupation and requisitioning businesses. The question is not about eugenics but resistance. Supplantation ofthe whole of a people by the Germans could not have been sustained...Eugenics was big back then, Eisenhower even supported it; it was only after the war that everyone started associating it with the people who kicked their asses and thought it was bad.
people could not give a monkeys about eugenics,but didaout their countries and freedom
USSR is not the subject of debate. I said Nazism would not last in Europe.Everyone hated the USSR, and it took them 50 years to get free of them, and unlike the USSR, Germany actually had an economy that wasn't shit. And since everyone who wasn't a Nazi was shot, I can see the 3rd Reich lasting a long time.
Non-nazis weren't shot for thesimple reason everyone pretended to be or resisted (underground, fighting in clandestine operations). You cannot take and hold a foreign nation in Europe unless yo are extremely skilled and doing it gradually. The Nazis economy would have overheated, it was based on slave labour and public schemes.
'Durr, I'm contradicting my earlier post saying its impossible to hold a country in Europe, hurr', give it a rest you little faggot, contrary to your beliefs, it isn't hard to take control of another country when your own country is stable. Burma is very unstable and just had massive riots, yet it held together, so I'm pretty sure Germany, with its huge industrial base could control a few frogs and backwater shitholes like Greece and Poland.Napoleon Ier wrote:Insufficient fighters left after WWII. They rolled in and booted out the Nazis, and then just took control. People thought they were liberators, but no. Then the great superpowers decided at Yalta for everyone who would be Russian subjects and who wouldn't. Besides, the clue is in your own post :ony 1/2 Europe. They were held.