Conquer club saga Mafia! Landgrab won! MUST READ!!!

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:43 pm

Scum tells, implying you knew I wasn't in the main mafia and random bandwagoning, unexplained votes on mr incrediball when the game had gone past random votes as we were at a critical conjuction.

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:43 pm

nagerous wrote:I already told you I'm the mayor

you also said you were AK

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:45 pm

dustn64 wrote:
nagerous wrote:I already told you I'm the mayor
you also said you were AK

and twilldo

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:50 pm

cena-rules wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
nagerous wrote:I already told you I'm the mayor
you also said you were AK
and twilldo

don't forget fircoal

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 2:52 pm

Anyway, so what? I'm playing about with my unlynchable role, does that really make me a bad person? I feel like its produced a good lead with dustn that I would like to follow up and the rest of the town should if they had any cajones

.

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:01 pm

nagerous wrote:Scum tells, implying you knew I wasn't in the main mafia and random bandwagoning, unexplained votes on mr incrediball when the game had gone past random votes as we were at a critical conjuction.

if you were in the main mafia, you'd have the sense to not act that scummy

we all wanted jake dead

past random votes? it's day 1 and the only lead is you

what critical conjunction?

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:02 pm

I'm defending you, why accuse me? Though I do love the colours.

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:06 pm

nagerous wrote:I'm defending you, why accuse me? Though I do love the colours.

*shrug* you weren't really defending me, you were attacking dustn

and accusing you? I've already explained why I think you're the jester.

cena-rules · Post by **cena-rules** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:08 pm

well if my vote isnt already on nagerous

unvote vote nagerous

Im not posting any more while hes being a prick

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:16 pm

Hey I'm the one here trying to produce a strong lead against dustn, no-one else is coming up with any theories, so I'm going to provide the town with an ultimatum because I'd rather not be sworn at. Either lynch me or dustn today, if dustn turns up pro-town vig me, SK me whatever I don't care, this game is annoying me.

kalishnikov · Post by **kalishnikov** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:22 pm

nagerous wrote:Hey I'm the one here trying to produce a strong lead against dustn, no-one else is coming up with any theories, so I'm going to provide the town with an ultimatum because I'd rather not be sworn at. Either lynch me or dustn today, if dustn turns up pro-town vig me, SK me whatever I don't care, this game is annoying me.

Unvote, vote: dustn

I'll buy that.

Dustn turns up scum, nag lives till tomorrow; dustn is clean, nag get's vig'ed tonight.

VIG, read this post.

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:56 pm

My vote is already on dustn.

But also, did anyone else notice this:

nagerous wrote:Anyway, so what? I'm playing about with my unlynchable role, does that really make me a bad person? I feel like its produced a good lead with dustn that I would like to follow up and the rest of the town should if they had any cajones .

I think that would explain why he's acting the way he is.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:34 pm

Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Kwanton: 1 The Weird one
Nagerous : 3 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0
Jake 4 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream, neutrino,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 3 kalishnikov, nagerous, f1fth,
Mr I: 1 dustn
It takes 9 to lynch
I think that's correct

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:36 pm

Iliad wrote:Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Kwanton: 1 The Weird one
Nagerous : 2 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0
Jake 4 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream, neutrino,
cena rules: 3 kwantion, LSU,
dusn: 3 kalishnikov, nagerous, f1fth,
Mr I: 1 dustn
It takes 9 to lynch
I think that's correct

nearly

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:42 pm

sorry for not posting.. my net died.

This is very interesting. Why would AD still be going after me when there are way better leads than just vote hopping?

Nag brings a good point about dustn, and it seems legit, but I'm keeping my vote off him for the moment.

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:19 pm

I repeat: Nagerous is either telling the truth and is unlynchable, or lying and is something along the lines of a jester. Either way, I think you'd be wasting your vote on him.

And Nag's point about dustn is a good one, much better than any other point I've seen so far.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:21 pm

cena-rules wrote:AK_iceman(PPD reductor)
ppd is 25(high)

this is me

nagerous wrote:my role name is AK_Iceman if thats needed.

Am I the only one who's noticed this?

Vote: Nagerous

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:22 pm

Neutrino wrote:
cena-rules wrote:AK_iceman(PPD reductor)
ppd is 25(high)

this is me

nagerous wrote:my role name is AK_Iceman if thats needed.
Am I the only one who's noticed this?

Vote: Nagerous

I can't believe I missed that. vote nag.

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:23 pm

Neutrino wrote:
cena-rules wrote:AK_iceman(PPD reductor)
ppd is 25(high)

this is me

nagerous wrote:my role name is AK_Iceman if thats needed.
Am I the only one who's noticed this?

Vote: Nagerous

Argh. He's doing that on purpose.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:43 pm

Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Nagerous : 5 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 3 kalishnikov, nagerous, f1fth,
Mr I: 1 dustn
It takes 9 to lynch
I think that's correct

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:51 pm

It's been a really long day 1 and I'm enforcing a deadline. Wednesday 5:00

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:58 pm

I don't see why people are going after nagerous still.

There's two options about nagerous.
1 - To believe what he said, that he is unlynchable. This would explain why he is acting different than other mafia games he is in. The last two people that voted for nagerous would be slightly skimming, as he has changed his roll-claim name multiple times. It's a joke to him, and being unlynchable would explain it.

OR, the least unlikely option

2 - He is jester, trying to get lynched.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:51 am

Iliad wrote:Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Kwanton: 1 The Weird one
Nagerous : 5 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 3 kalishnikov, nagerous, f1fth,
Mr I: 1 dustn
It takes 9 to lynch
I think that's correct

i didn't know i had a multi

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:15 am

F1fth wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
cena-rules wrote:AK_iceman(PPD reductor)
ppd is 25(high)

this is me

nagerous wrote:my role name is AK_Iceman if thats needed.
Am I the only one who's noticed this?

Vote: Nagerous
Argh. He's doing that on purpose.

QFT! Listen to the smart man! he is doing it for a reason I am not sure of. That's why he doesn't have my vote.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:18 am

Actually, after reading through again, I'm going to vote dustn. Nagerous makes good points about him.