His last post sounds more to me like trying to defend a scum buddy under the guise of of not lynching an inactive rather then actually trying to persuade us from lynching an inactive player.
If that makes any sense (proly not).
Besides, we've all seen him on enough day 1 bandwagons on inactives/random noobs to think it's a bluff.
Don't you think I would profit more from being on Unit_2's bandwagon if we were scum buddies more than arguing his case? He is a deadbeat, and if i was scum with him, i would hop the wagon, not argue for him.
His last post sounds more to me like trying to defend a scum buddy under the guise of of not lynching an inactive rather then actually trying to persuade us from lynching an inactive player.
If that makes any sense (proly not).
Besides, we've all seen him on enough day 1 bandwagons on inactives/random noobs to think it's a bluff.
Don't you think I would profit more from being on Unit_2's bandwagon if we were scum buddies more than arguing his case? He is a deadbeat, and if i was scum with him, i would hop the wagon, not argue for him.
Perhaps. Unless it's small groups of scum and losing 1 would hurt you (Batman mafia, for instance ) bad.
His last post sounds more to me like trying to defend a scum buddy under the guise of of not lynching an inactive rather then actually trying to persuade us from lynching an inactive player.
If that makes any sense (proly not).
Besides, we've all seen him on enough day 1 bandwagons on inactives/random noobs to think it's a bluff.
Don't you think I would profit more from being on Unit_2's bandwagon if we were scum buddies more than arguing his case? He is a deadbeat, and if i was scum with him, i would hop the wagon, not argue for him.
Perhaps. Unless it's small groups of scum and losing 1 would hurt you (Batman mafia, for instance ) bad.
I like your references You have a point. But if i was scum with Unit_2, and in a small group, I would rather sell him out and buy some innocence, rather than protect my scum deadbeat, who you guys could tie back to me if he died.
His last post sounds more to me like trying to defend a scum buddy under the guise of of not lynching an inactive rather then actually trying to persuade us from lynching an inactive player.
If that makes any sense (proly not).
Besides, we've all seen him on enough day 1 bandwagons on inactives/random noobs to think it's a bluff.
Don't you think I would profit more from being on Unit_2's bandwagon if we were scum buddies more than arguing his case? He is a deadbeat, and if i was scum with him, i would hop the wagon, not argue for him.
Perhaps. Unless it's small groups of scum and losing 1 would hurt you (Batman mafia, for instance ) bad.
I like your references You have a point. But if i was scum with Unit_2, and in a small group, I would rather sell him out and buy some innocence, rather than protect my scum deadbeat, who you guys could tie back to me if he died.
We woulda had that game if I wouldn't have got NK'ed...
And your right, I just figured I throw it out there.
jnd94 wrote:I was Nina Stickler in Aimless's BPS......are you calling me scum!?!! BITCH!!!
I thought it was Mandy or LSU? Anyway, all three of you are scum. I'm sure of it!
0. I still think that Nina Stickler was scum. If the evidence don't agree with me, that's evidene's problem.
1. Vote Fircoal pro forma.
2. I will be unable to participate in this game in any kind of constructive manner until Monday. Presently I am baby-sittig my friend's african mice. Connection is yuckie, mouse (computer one) is too. On the other hand, there is booze and complete 3rd season of Dr. House. So, should bandwagon form on me for submarrining (as opposed to one being formed on me because african mice are a scum tell ), I would prefer being subed to being lynched. Sorry Spin.
3. If you guys allow me to live 'till Monday evening, I promise a crazy theory.
wow 3 mouse problems.
An african one
a computer one
and an electric one. (me)