Skittles! wrote:I'm under 18, luckily. I don't see who I would vote for this election if I was over 18. If there was a Communist Party, then sure I'll vote for that when I'm older, but unfortunately that got shut down in '91.
If you want to, you could vote socialist alliance - then you could be one of those really annoying people who turn up at every single kind of protest holding socialist alliance banners when the protest has NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICAL PARTIES... very annoying
Iliad wrote:I'm too young to vote yet if I was I would either vote for Greens(the enviroment is a very important topic and the greens would deal with it best) or Labour.
Has anyone noticed how Howard is trying to get the votes of the elderly while Rudd is targeting the younger generations?
Howard always goes for the grey vote - It's easy for him to appeal to them because everyone else his age is as racsist and close-minded as him.
Skittles! wrote:I'm under 18, luckily. I don't see who I would vote for this election if I was over 18. If there was a Communist Party, then sure I'll vote for that when I'm older, but unfortunately that got shut down in '91.
If you want to, you could vote socialist alliance - then you could be one of those really annoying people who turn up at every single kind of protest holding socialist alliance banners when the protest has NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICAL PARTIES... very annoying
yeah.. No. Not in my mind. Ha.
Greens.. My parents have told me to never, ever vote for the Greens.. They've told me numerous times the reasons why, but I keep forgetting. If Peter Garrett wouldn't join the Greens, and he's very environmentalist, then yeah.
I really disrespect Howard.. How had is it to say 'sorry' to the Indigenous populations? Not very hard.
And radiojake, I know many people older than him that are no where near as close-minded as him, like my grandmother.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Iliad wrote:I'm too young to vote yet if I was I would either vote for Greens(the enviroment is a very important topic and the greens would deal with it best) or Labour.
Has anyone noticed how Howard is trying to get the votes of the elderly while Rudd is targeting the younger generations?
Howard always goes for the grey vote - It's easy for him to appeal to them because everyone else his age is as racsist and close-minded as him.
Skittles! wrote:I'm under 18, luckily. I don't see who I would vote for this election if I was over 18. If there was a Communist Party, then sure I'll vote for that when I'm older, but unfortunately that got shut down in '91.
There were two at one point for some obscure reason.
I seem to recall reading of a "Lower Excise (sp?) on Fuel and Beer Party".
How pointlessly specific is that?
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
Skittles! wrote:I'm under 18, luckily. I don't see who I would vote for this election if I was over 18. If there was a Communist Party, then sure I'll vote for that when I'm older, but unfortunately that got shut down in '91.
There were two at one point for some obscure reason.
I seem to recall reading of a "Lower Excise (sp?) on Fuel and Beer Party". How pointlessly specific is that?
That seriously is weird. Why would you want to cut down on Beer? I know Fuel, but BEER?
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:I'm under 18, luckily. I don't see who I would vote for this election if I was over 18. If there was a Communist Party, then sure I'll vote for that when I'm older, but unfortunately that got shut down in '91.
There were two at one point for some obscure reason.
I seem to recall reading of a "Lower Excise (sp?) on Fuel and Beer Party". How pointlessly specific is that?
That seriously is weird. Why would you want to cut down on Beer? I know Fuel, but BEER?
Oh no, they just want to cut down on the cost of importing beer and fuel. That's all they do.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
One can never have enough entirely superflous political parties...
Fishing Party
Non-Custodial Parents Party
Nuclear Disarmament Party
One Nation Party
Pauline's United Australia Party
Shooters Party
Liberals for Forests
Lower Excise Fuel and Beer Party
New Country Party
No GST Party
One Nation NSW (Oldfield group)
Outdoor Recreation Party
People Power Party
Progressive Labour Party
Save Our Suburbs
Secular Party of Australia
Socialist Party
Tasmania First Party
Unity Party (Australia)
Great Australians Party
Grey Power
HEMP (Help End Marijuana Prohibition)
And many, many more...
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
Skoffin wrote: Heh, was alright. Am I the only person that wants to punch Rudd in the face? And Peter Garrett, that guy is useless.
You are right with Garrett. Why would someone with that many environmental political songs with Midnight Oil end up joining the Labour Party? Fucking sellout--
But yes, just cos im not voting Labour means ill be voting Liberal
I LOVE TWO PARTY SYSTEM!! WHO DO I WANT? THE GREEDY ARSEHOLE ON THE RIGHT OR THE OTHER GREEDY ARSEHOLE ON THE RIGHT?
your right about that, 30 odd billion in tax cuts is not what we need right now.
i'm Christian but i'm probably up with the separation of church and state, that said if they get elected then its not like you can say its wrong, it just means they represent all the folk with the same viewpoint, as they should. I tend to be more left wing then family first, and more right wing then the democrats, so i really don't know who to vote for, i would straight away vote for the party that opposed 30 billion in tax cuts, but what can you do.
