a new rank

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply

is this a good idea

good idea
12
44%
bad idea
15
56%
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
nyg5680
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:50 am
Location: united states

a new rank

Post by nyg5680 »

i know this idea has been brought up about making a new rank and im not sure what ever happened 2 it. i was thinkin of somethin like a president or a dictator. and this is how it would work you would have your first and only general as the president and then when we got our second general they would play a risk game to see who will be the new president the one that loses has to wait 15 days 2 fight the president again if hes still a general
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

sounds abit complicated
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

And what when we get a third general? A three way war? That would still work, but imagine if we get 7 generals at some point. A standard game wouldn't cut it anymore.

Nah, leave it as it is.
User avatar
nyg5680
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:50 am
Location: united states

Post by nyg5680 »

than you would hav a bi for the 1 that is already the president or hav a tournament
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

too complicated. I agree we should have another rank so the alstergren's and Pilates of the world ave something to shoot for. However your proposal doesn't fit with any of the other rankings CC currently has.

Just add Marshall. 4000 points, 300 games.
User avatar
nyg5680
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:50 am
Location: united states

Post by nyg5680 »

ok i was just suggestion it
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

maybe every two months highborn (now in charge of tourneys) sets up tournament games where the top 12 people enter and the winner gets some special title for the rest of the month.

it could be set up:

round 1:
3 games 4 people each. positions in game drawn randomly. winner in each game moves on

round 2:
One game with 3 people (the winner from each game in round 1)
Winner is known as Riskmaster until the next tournament.
Image
sfhbballnut
Posts: 1687
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 3:01 pm

top rank

Post by sfhbballnut »

how about giving the person at the top of the standings their own rank?
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

wcaclimbing wrote:maybe every two months highborn (now in charge of tourneys) sets up tournament games where the top 12 people enter and the winner gets some special title for the rest of the month.

it could be set up:

round 1:
3 games 4 people each. positions in game drawn randomly. winner in each game moves on

round 2:
One game with 3 people (the winner from each game in round 1)
Winner is known as Riskmaster until the next tournament.
What if some of the ppl in the top 12 dont want to play in that tournament?
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

then they wouldnt have to and the 13th place man would take his place
Image
User avatar
nyg5680
Posts: 1343
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 10:50 am
Location: united states

Post by nyg5680 »

waclimbings idea is way better than mine
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

It's still not a very good one though IMO. I would bet a few people in the top 12 wouldn't want to play in that game. Perhaps the first one everyoen would play but after a while people wouldn't. So we could have someone in 15th-20th place and their rank is riskmaster? Then they hold that position for a month, and we all know your score can drop precipitously in a few days time. I don't want to see someone in like 50th place with the rank of riskmaster.
User avatar
hendy
Posts: 656
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:33 pm

think

Post by hendy »

I think is should be corpal
User avatar
GabonX
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Post by GabonX »

I think it would be cool if there were Generals of different ranks. In real armies, Generals have a number of stars to indicate who is in chrage. 1 star if the lowest ranking General and 4 stars is the highest in non war times. In war time the highest rank is a 5 star General, so maybe the top player could have 5 of the current General icon to indicate supremacy.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”