joshuabrandon/melgibson, [Busted]

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:45 am

rules wrote: Rule #1
NO multis

notice that it says "no multis", not "no multis unless they are in team games and the person that made them thinks its not cheating"

Joshuabrandon · Post by **Joshuabrandon** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:50 am

one per person right...read the hole post and the whole thing before you post...ok now im out
seriously this time...
ok maybe ill keep checking back and will post because i have to much free time between calls...
but thats it...

Joshuabrandon · Post by **Joshuabrandon** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:18 am

ok let see...if i can slow this down for you...lets say people lived together and let see they stumbled accross this site...and lets say they liked it and both wanted to play...but for fear of cheating accusations they only played team games together....and any other games they played separetly...because its fair to assume even if they did not form an alliance it would only be natural for them to favor one another. So as to be above reproach they only played team matches together...not only is that fair...but would only be considered a multi by the strictest interpretaion of a multi and its really a mute point and a waste of breath to argue...as was stated before we didn't cheat so whats the complaint exactly...I believe the complaint originated from jaydog who was saying that since we both missed our turn because our computer was down that he was going to complain...which was a very gay thing to do especially since he won as a result of us missing...otherwise he would have lost

mightyal · Post by **mightyal** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:25 am

lets say people lived together and let see they stumbled accross this site...and lets say they liked it and both wanted to play...but for fear of cheating accusations they only played team games together....and any other games they played separetly...because its fair to assume even if they did not form an alliance it would only be natural for them to favor one another. So as to be above reproach they only played team matches together.

That is not a multi.

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:10 am

when i play against my brother, its my goal to kill him off, cause i dont like him

nascarfan38124 · Post by **nascarfan38124** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:47 am

wcaclimbing wrote:when i play against my brother, its my goal to kill him off, cause i dont like him

depending on how much he annoyed me recently i do that too but mainly to win the game

eye84free · Post by **eye84free** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:18 pm

and no u wouldnt have won even if u played the game...just to let u know...thats all ill say in this topic...lol....because its about cheating and abuse...

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:04 pm

I see this bieng a big problem if they are tellign the truth because there ARE alot of people who play from the same IP.. for example owl and amanda are dating and they play from the same computer... and highborn and kylie .. does that mean that the yboth cant have accounts becasue of the same IP?

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:02 am

lol this thread is hysterical...look at the way they post...they type just like each other...its equivelent to having the same voice...not to mention schizophrenic...sound like multis to me...

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:21 am

mightyal wrote:
lets say people lived together and let see they stumbled accross this site...and lets say they liked it and both wanted to play...but for fear of cheating accusations they only played team games together....and any other games they played separetly...because its fair to assume even if they did not form an alliance it would only be natural for them to favor one another. So as to be above reproach they only played team matches together.
That is not a multi.

evil semp miss semp..

and there were a couple others i've seen.

ZawBanjito · Post by **ZawBanjito** » Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:32 pm

People draggin the weirdest crap in the world into this. This entire complaint is based on minute analysis of what they're saying and how they're saying it. If they just shut up and never talked, nobody would have a single complaint, because there wouldn't be anything to complain about.

Anyway, I believe them. Or I believe we should give them the benefit of the doubt on this. Has precedent been set on an issue like this? Obviously a more refined definition of multi needs to be made. The super-legalistic interpretation people are supporting this claim on is not functional, since it reduces the entire "what is a multi" question down to "two or more accounts sharing a computer." It's really unrealistic to say that if you want to play Conquer Club - as striped down and simplistic a multiplayer game to play as there is on the internet - you and you alone must own your own computer. There should also be evidence of multi behavior, which there isn't here, except for one line someone dug up that suggests both accounts are accessed by one person, which they admit to. They're not otherwise gaming the system.

Otherwise, the only evidence gathered is: 1) They uh, claim to live in the same house and use the same computer. And incidentally be brothers. 2) They have similar writing styles. And incidentally they might be brothers. Who live together.

I agree that the "brother" claim is tired as hell, but it has to happen sometimes. There are a lot of people with brothers out there.

And getting someone else to play your turns when you're over at their house is what everyone does. It's bloody useful too. I've missed a hell of a lot of turns where I wished I could call up someone and say dude play the turn for me. In faaaaact, I know a certain moooooderator what done it just a few days ago, ehhehehehehe.

I'm a get in trouble for that, I worry...

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:33 pm

joshuabrandon and melgibson are BUSTED for being multiple accounts.

--Andy

jaydog · Post by **jaydog** » Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:40 am

thanks Andy