F1fth wrote:Well, I think that one of the reasons why the games are slow is that two people can't vote the same person lest the instantly get accused of bandwagoning and holy hell being raised.
It makes it so that no one wants to vote anyone, or heaven forbid, lynch someone. People will die in this game no matter what, and once again, it's not the end of the world if someone dies for a stupid reason, or a poor lynch is made. As a matter of fact, it's a good thing because you're able to pick scummy actions out of it.
It's like: how is the decision for a lynch made? By majority. By the logic presented, every person who's ever been lynched in the history of the game of mafia has been bandwagoned.
I hate that phrase and it's being throw around far too often these days.
Vote diddle. He's just been playing very conservatively. It's only a hunch, and I have no hard evidence on him, but none on anyone else for that matter. Hate me or lynch me for it. I don't care.
if I'm not active this week it's because I'm grounded. I'll still try to get in one post a day in all of my games while at school, but can't be sure I'll be able to.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
F1fth wrote:Well, I think that one of the reasons why the games are slow is that two people can't vote the same person lest the instantly get accused of bandwagoning and holy hell being raised.
It makes it so that no one wants to vote anyone, or heaven forbid, lynch someone. People will die in this game no matter what, and once again, it's not the end of the world if someone dies for a stupid reason, or a poor lynch is made. As a matter of fact, it's a good thing because you're able to pick scummy actions out of it.
It's like: how is the decision for a lynch made? By majority. By the logic presented, every person who's ever been lynched in the history of the game of mafia has been bandwagoned.
I hate that phrase and it's being throw around far too often these days.
Vote diddle. He's just been playing very conservatively. It's only a hunch, and I have no hard evidence on him, but none on anyone else for that matter. Hate me or lynch me for it. I don't care.
The starter of the diddle-wagon.
What's your point? I brought forth reasoning of why you seemed suspicious (because there was absolutely nothing else going on at the time), and when you presented reasonable proof otherwise, I unvoted without hesitation. First an attempt to bandwagon MIB (which was based on a huge oversight) and now me. Acting pretty defensively, huh? I'm very suspicious of you at this point.
But still, you're claim hold up for now. And LSU's attempt at lynching you (and his vote still on you) without a claim needs to be answered for.
<>---------------------------<> ......Come play CC Mafia, .....where happiness lies <>----------[Link]----------<>
F1fth wrote:Well, I think that one of the reasons why the games are slow is that two people can't vote the same person lest the instantly get accused of bandwagoning and holy hell being raised.
It makes it so that no one wants to vote anyone, or heaven forbid, lynch someone. People will die in this game no matter what, and once again, it's not the end of the world if someone dies for a stupid reason, or a poor lynch is made. As a matter of fact, it's a good thing because you're able to pick scummy actions out of it.
It's like: how is the decision for a lynch made? By majority. By the logic presented, every person who's ever been lynched in the history of the game of mafia has been bandwagoned.
I hate that phrase and it's being throw around far too often these days.
Vote diddle. He's just been playing very conservatively. It's only a hunch, and I have no hard evidence on him, but none on anyone else for that matter. Hate me or lynch me for it. I don't care.
The starter of the diddle-wagon.
What's your point? I brought forth reasoning of why you seemed suspicious (because there was absolutely nothing else going on at the time), and when you presented reasonable proof otherwise, I unvoted without hesitation. First an attempt to bandwagon MIB (which was based on a huge oversight) and now me. Acting pretty defensively, huh? I'm very suspicious of you at this point.
But still, you're claim hold up for now. And LSU's attempt at lynching you (and his vote still on you) without a claim needs to be answered for.
I'm not going to vote you, just seeing what the others would do.