(Thread of CC Records) 1st 5's & TOP 5's

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:39 am

most rounds

doing top 5

currently this is the info i have and will update later

470183 rounds 479

109511 rounds ended 400

288082 rounds ended 390

205842 rounds ended 334

45500 rounds ended 333

59230 rounds 321

268332 rounds 306

90419 rounds 371

103227 rounds 300

249959 rounds 297

704071 rounds 287

187179 rounds 267

746010 rounds 221

175704 rounds 236

315900 rounds 220

320963 rounds 211

150052 rounds 271

183512 rounds 255

207959 rounds 222

320960 rounds 205

255573 rounds 197

if i missed any let me know or post in here, ty

again only doing top 5, but any games over 200 rounds may last into top 5

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:40 am

Robinette wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?

10 more in one day

stop being so nice to people

go back to your old ways
316

I was always a nice guy

nice (nīs)
adj. nic·er, nic·est

1. Pleasing and agreeable in nature: had a nice time.
2. Having a pleasant or attractive appearance: a nice dress; a nice face.
3. Exhibiting courtesy and politeness: a nice gesture.
4. Of good character and reputation; respectable.
5. Overdelicate or fastidious; fussy.
6. Showing or requiring great precision or sensitive discernment; subtle: a nice distinction; a nice sense of style.
7. Done with delicacy and skill: a nice bit of craft.
8. Used as an intensive with and: nice and warm.

mis·un·der·stood /ˌmɪsʌndərˈstʊd/ Pronunciation[mis-uhn-der-stood]

–adjective
1. improperly understood or interpreted.
2. unappreciated.

–verb (used with object), -stood, -stand·ing.
1. to take (words, statements, etc.) in a wrong sense; understand wrongly.
2. to fail to understand or interpret rightly the words or behavior of.

well done robinette

jr 325 now? holy cow

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:56 am

update
game round
268332 365
187179 302
175704 251
320963 250
320960 234
255573 213
491902 211

Scott-Land · Post by **Scott-Land** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:43 am

Poo-Maker should be on Top 5 to reach 3.5K ( not sure how many times or how it qualifies) and also Top 5 ranks-singles ( either #2 or #3)

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:11 am

Scott-Land wrote:Poo-Maker should be on Top 5 to reach 3.5K ( not sure how many times or how it qualifies) and also Top 5 ranks-singles ( either #2 or #3)

Poo definitely one of the top singles players but 46% win rate excludes him from this list of singles players.

Scott-Land · Post by **Scott-Land** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:23 am

Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard. EDIT: Pretty sure Poo held #2 rank and positive he held #3. Unless all those categories are all under 40- then you are correct.

there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:28 am

Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard.

there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........

scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x

top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.

ty scott for the help, appreciate it, poo is about to win a singles game that we played for many months, ugh lol

poo-maker · Post by **poo-maker** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:31 am

Blitzaholic wrote: scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x

top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.

You're right, i only made it over 3500 once.

I got to 2nd place though, with SkyT above me in 1st and comic boy in 3rd.

poo-maker · Post by **poo-maker** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:34 am

Blitzaholic wrote:ty scott for the help, appreciate it, poo is about to win a singles game that we played for many months, ugh lol

I'm only in the lead because of sheer luck... I won a 83-80 with 30 left to spare...

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:55 am

Scott-Land wrote:Comic- the two i'm speaking of are Top 5 reaching 3.5k x amount of times and 5 top singles rank- players actually holding #3 rank or better on the scoreboard. EDIT: Pretty sure Poo held #2 rank and positive he held #3. Unless all those categories are all under 40- then you are correct.

there's a separate category for Top 5 under 40%........

LOL Scott all these Blitz lists confuse the hell out of me

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 10:41 am

Game 663689
Round 354

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:43 am

poo-maker wrote:
Blitzaholic wrote: scott is right about poo for reaching 3.5K, i think he only did it once, if he does it again, he will get 2x

top 5 singles rank, means a singles player that had been #1, #2 or #3 on the scoreboard, has he been 1,2,3 on the scoreboard? I may have missed it.
You're right, i only made it over 3500 once.

I got to 2nd place though, with SkyT above me in 1st and comic boy in 3rd.

ok, updated

you just knocked off my good friend martin from the list, grrrrr

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:43 am

happy2seeyou wrote:Game 663689
Round 354

will update this later court

u and paul having a tiff

happy2seeyou · Post by **happy2seeyou** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:44 am

nope, we were having fun teasing each other last night will tell you about it later.

In that game, we each have over 70,000 armies

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:46 am

happy2seeyou wrote:nope, we were having fun teasing each other last night will tell you about it later.

In that game, we each have over 70,000 armies

ok

will update top 5 rounds shortly

armies counts on lands, i am also considering

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 11:48 am

Blitzaholic wrote:jr, 315 positive feedbacks?

10 more in one day

345

30 more the next day

what are you doing to these players

1st one to 400 feedbacks jr or clapper? race is on

firstholliday · Post by **firstholliday** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:07 pm

actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)

1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.

He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.

Just a tosser in my humble opinion.

Gilligan · Post by **Gilligan** » Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:18 pm

What about the longest/shortest tournaments, and the tournaments with the most/least games?

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:29 pm

firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)

1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.

He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.

Just a tosser in my humble opinion.

ouch-pretty harsh

u and jr have a tiff?

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:30 pm

Gilligan wrote:What about the longest/shortest tournaments, and the tournaments with the most/least games?

good suggestions gilligan

will need to think about this, you have any info on some of this?

Blitzaholic · Post by **Blitzaholic** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:31 pm

Not sure any one has ever done this, well maybe 1 or 2, not sure

1st 5 to 3K score and 3K posts

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

something to shoot for maybe in the future?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 9:42 pm

firstholliday wrote:actually i think he should be excluded from this list. (JR)

1. he cheats in freestyle.
2. All his games are against luits or lower. All high ranks are on his ignore list.

He will say anyone can join my games. But he will drop if he suspects bad play.

Just a tosser in my humble opinion.

346 players seem to disagree with you and because of you telling everyone to leave me negative feedback is the only reason why I have 15. you sat there and monitered over 1,000 1 vs 1 games that I played ( about 6,000 turns) and than when I doubled up ( about 20 turns ) you PM'd the player telling them to leave me feedback. Did you PM all the players that played the same tactic vs me? than you got balls to leave me negative feedback that I did this to you and we never even played a 1 vs 1 or freestyle game. talk about abusing the system. I had to get the feedback removed.

now can anyone figure out why this player is on my ignore list? Oh let me guess... because he beat me once or twice. right ?

so I should not be included on any top 5's because of this "tosser" is on my ignore list

good fight noob

David_Wain · Post by **David_Wain** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:29 am

And I made ur ignore list because??

Genghis Khan CA · Post by **Genghis Khan CA** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:33 am

David_Wain wrote:And I made ur ignore list because??

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:43 am

Genghis Khan CA wrote:

Genghis Khan is not on my list