Anyway, would a small polar ice cap make that more obvious to idiots like me? Forgive me if this has already been suggested.
Moderator: Cartographers

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.I mentioned that before - but I think Oaky missed it...yeti_c wrote:I wonder if you should put a bit of Ice in the middle to represent the North Pole... (That definitely still existed in the 50's!!)
Or would that make it too cluttered?!
C.
What would be ace (It's not possible) was if international borders were opened up after the first nuclear salvo was launched!!
Pre nuclear salvo movement would be restricted to same colour states!!

No, I didn't miss it... I just forgot about it. My concern is having landmass (or in this case ice-mass) that is not playable. It wouldn't be a territory, yet it could be enough to throw players off the first time they play it. I'm going for user-friendly. But I'm not opposed to doing a quick version with an ice cap just to see what people think.yeti_c wrote:I mentioned that before - but I think Oaky missed it...yeti_c wrote:I wonder if you should put a bit of Ice in the middle to represent the North Pole... (That definitely still existed in the 50's!!)
Or would that make it too cluttered?!

I think it'd be worth a shot to try the artic ice cap...that sounds like it would be perhaps the best idea. If that doesn't work, you could always add something similar to what Bad Speler did in the Artic Map (the N).oaktown wrote: No, I didn't miss it... I just forgot about it. My concern is having landmass (or in this case ice-mass) that is not playable. It wouldn't be a territory, yet it could be enough to throw players off the first time they play it. I'm going for user-friendly. But I'm not opposed to doing a quick version with an ice cap just to see what people think.
The UK to Scandinavia link would make sense... it'll lock up the Europe region and ultimately make it an easier hold.
I'm about to step out for the weekend, so I'll play with it next week. In the meantime, I don't want to see anybody else using the "f" word in this thread unless it is a mod.
Are you shure its not the drink thats making you a bit idiotik????Backglass wrote:I had to look at this map several times before realizing it was a "top down" view. (As if from space! (private joke)).
Anyway, would a small polar ice cap make that more obvious to idiots like me? Forgive me if this has already been suggested.
I think he was meaning that scandinavia looks like a ballsack.Gnome wrote:what looks wrong here unit? the pointed edge?
And the idea about the ice cap doesn't really attracts me...(I thought the ice cap was ment to be in the north or something)
I think this map is really good and...
Nothing to add that bothers me...
... yeahreverend_kyle wrote:I think he was meaning that scandinavia looks like a ballsack.Gnome wrote:what looks wrong here unit? the pointed edge?
And the idea about the ice cap doesn't really attracts me...(I thought the ice cap was ment to be in the north or something)
I think this map is really good and...
Nothing to add that bothers me...

It looks even better on a euro coin, when Norway isn't there!oaktown wrote:right, i should change that., because in no way does scandivia look like genitalia.reverend_kyle wrote:I think he was meaning that scandinavia looks like a ballsack.![]()
norway asked not to be includedyeti_c wrote:I was always confused as to why Norway was omitted... I Assume it was because Norway doesn't have the Euro...
But then again neither does the UK!
C>



