All people can be classified into 3 groups.

Chris7He · Post by **Chris7He** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 6:34 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

LOLZ

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:07 pm

cena-rules wrote:some people believe in a number of gods

That would go into Group 3.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:09 pm

Chris7He wrote:
Gregrios wrote:Everybody on earth can be classified into 1 of the 3 following groups.

Group 1: A person who lives by the word of God, believes in God.

Group 2: A person who believes in God but chooses not to live by the words of God, is a hater of God.

Group 3: A person who lives by their own assumptions, does not believe in God.

It is completely up to every individual to choose the way of life they want.

The person's choice will no doubtably fall into 1 of these 3 groups.

If anyone can find legitimate fault with this claim, please let me know.
People who believe in other gods or people who simply have not been taught the word of God.

That would also be Group 3.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:10 pm

Guiscard wrote:What about people who believe in God but don't believe the 'word' of God is a truthful reflection?

That would be group 2.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:11 pm

the three groupings are probably true-but not a very interesting point.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:12 pm

Pagan?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:13 pm

suggs wrote:the three groupings are probably true-but not a very interesting point.

Actually its just untrue and boring. It just floats around there like an unsatisfying turd. Let this thread die.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:14 pm

heavycola wrote:All people can be defined into two groups.

1) gregrios
2) everyone else.

If my logic is at fault, please do tell.

The part about putting people into 2 groups is right.

A person could say the 2 groups are believers and non-believers but I figured I would use my brain a little more than that.

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:14 pm

thats essentially believing in a god or a number of gods so fits into the groupings (eg Mother Nature = a god)

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:14 pm

Gregrios wrote:
heavycola wrote:All people can be defined into two groups.

1) gregrios
2) everyone else.

If my logic is at fault, please do tell.

The part about putting people into 2 groups is right.

A person could say the 2 groups are believers and non-believers but I figured I would use my brain a little more than that.

Welcome to the third grade.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:17 pm

F1fth wrote:
Gregrios wrote:Everybody on earth can be classified into 1 of the 3 following groups.

Group 1: A person who lives by the word of God, believes in God.

Group 2: A person who believes in God but chooses not to live by the words of God, is a hater of God.

Group 3: A person who lives by their own assumptions, does not believe in God.

It is completely up to every individual to choose the way of life they want.

The person's choice will no doubtably fall into 1 of these 3 groups.

If anyone can find legitimate fault with this claim, please let me know.
I fail to see a point to this. This is as arbitrary as saying:

Everybody can fall into 1 of 4 groups:

Group 1: Those who love Raymond.

Group 2: Those who hate Raymond

Group 3: Those who don't care about Raymond

Group 4: Those who don't know about Raymond.

I'm not trying to be mean or anything. Just asking that you clarify what you mean by posting this, because I sense that there is a reason.

If you hadn't noticed, this topic came up in another thread and I felt like clearifying the 2 points.

static_ice · Post by **static_ice** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:17 pm

Why would this matter anyway? You could divide people into as many groups as you want, but it doesn't change the fact that in the end we all fall into one group.

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:17 pm

unriggable wrote:
Gregrios wrote:
heavycola wrote:All people can be defined into two groups.

1) gregrios
2) everyone else.

If my logic is at fault, please do tell.

The part about putting people into 2 groups is right.

A person could say the 2 groups are believers and non-believers but I figured I would use my brain a little more than that.
Welcome to the third grade.

Gregrios likes clear boundaries, and never mind if they fit or not.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:20 pm

Dancing Mustard wrote:Whoopsie, looks like you missed at least three types from that list:

People who believe in god and choose to live by their own assumptions, but don't necessarily 'hate' god?

People who don't believe in god but who choose to live by his word?

People who kidnap other people's children, chain them to radiators, burn their feet with blowtorches and candles, then masturbate all over them before choking them by stuffing the last victim's clothes down their screaming throats.

There, that's three big fat holes blasted through your logic already... I win.

Why don't you take a minute and read what you just wrote. It's just a little too hypicritical.

riggable · Post by **riggable** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:22 pm

Gregrios wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Whoopsie, looks like you missed at least three types from that list:

People who believe in god and choose to live by their own assumptions, but don't necessarily 'hate' god?

People who don't believe in god but who choose to live by his word?

People who kidnap other people's children, chain them to radiators, burn their feet with blowtorches and candles, then masturbate all over them before choking them by stuffing the last victim's clothes down their screaming throats.

There, that's three big fat holes blasted through your logic already... I win.

Why don't you take a minute and read what you just wrote. It's just a little too hypicritical.

none of them are.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:23 pm

debra79 wrote:If there was a God he wouldn't have created an r'tard like Gregrios.

That was a good one. So far you've made the most sense. But I'm only on the first page.

Oh, by the way people. If your question fails to have relativity, I won't bother answering.

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:27 pm

suggs wrote:the three groupings are probably true-but not a very interesting point.

I wasn't trying to be interesting, only trying to make a point that everything we do is our own choice. Whatever the result might be.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:27 pm

Gregrios wrote:
Guiscard wrote:What about people who believe in God but don't believe the 'word' of God is a truthful reflection?
That would be group 2.

Actually.... no. Besides, there are multiple "words of God".

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:29 pm

Gregrios wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:Whoopsie, looks like you missed at least three types from that list:

People who believe in god and choose to live by their own assumptions, but don't necessarily 'hate' god?

People who don't believe in god but who choose to live by his word?

People who kidnap other people's children, chain them to radiators, burn their feet with blowtorches and candles, then masturbate all over them before choking them by stuffing the last victim's clothes down their screaming throats.

There, that's three big fat holes blasted through your logic already... I win.

Why don't you take a minute and read what you just wrote. It's just a little too hypicritical.

Please explain how they are 'hypicritical'.

Tyr · Post by **Tyr** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:29 pm

three groups are

people who think of witty ansers to these questions

people who wish they could

and people who arent satisfied with one witty comebacka nd spend hours thinking up another one only to find that people stopped talking about the thread

riggable · Post by **riggable** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:30 pm

Gregrios wrote:
suggs wrote:the three groupings are probably true-but not a very interesting point.
I wasn't trying to be interesting, only trying to make a point that everything we do is our own choice. Whatever the result might be.

how is grouping everyone into 3 groups proving a point that everything we do is our own choice?

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:31 pm

Gregrios wrote:
suggs wrote:the three groupings are probably true-but not a very interesting point.
I wasn't trying to be interesting, only trying to make a point that everything we do is our own choice. Whatever the result might be.

But how does an arbitrary grouping show that everything we do is a choice? Couldn't you show that with a good deal of groupings?

Edit: Fast posted

Tyr · Post by **Tyr** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:34 pm

F1fth wrote:
Gregrios wrote:Everybody on earth can be classified into 1 of the 3 following groups.

Group 1: A person who lives by the word of God, believes in God.

Group 2: A person who believes in God but chooses not to live by the words of God, is a hater of God.

Group 3: A person who lives by their own assumptions, does not believe in God.

It is completely up to every individual to choose the way of life they want.

The person's choice will no doubtably fall into 1 of these 3 groups.

If anyone can find legitimate fault with this claim, please let me know.
I fail to see a point to this. This is as arbitrary as saying:

Everybody can fall into 1 of 4 groups:

Group 1: Those who love Raymond.

Group 2: Those who hate Raymond

Group 3: Those who don't care about Raymond

Group 4: Those who don't know about Raymond.

I'm not trying to be mean or anything. Just asking that you clarify what you mean by posting this, because I sense that there is a reason.

what about the ones who hate chris?

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:43 pm

There are three types of people.

Those who like me

Those who hate me

Those who do not care/know that I exist

I pity the ones in the last group. See?

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:48 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
Gregrios wrote:
Guiscard wrote:What about people who believe in God but don't believe the 'word' of God is a truthful reflection?
That would be group 2.
Actually.... no. Besides, there are multiple "words of God".

It depends on the sceniro. That could really go 2 ways. Group 2 or 3.

1st scenirio: a believing person that chooses not to listen can't like God too much. And what's the opposite of like? It's dislike or as I said "hate". Group 2.

2nd scenirio: a believing person who simply don't know what the word of God is. This would be the group I've spent most of my life in. They believe but don't understand it. Group 3.

It was a good question. Next time though, just think about it a little longer before finding fault with it. That's all I ask.

I did jump the gun with my 1st answer but hopefully I've answered your question. Your scenirio fits 2 of the groups previously mentioned.

All people can be classified into 3 groups.

Re: All people can be classified into 3 groups.

Re: All people can be classified into 3 groups.

Re: All people can be classified into 3 groups.