Anarkistsdream wrote:Looks like Fircoal has submarined to me... Don't know why, unless he thinks posting will make him look bad. Although, usually that doesn't stop him...
Anarkistsdream wrote:Looks like Fircoal has submarined to me... Don't know why, unless he thinks posting will make him look bad. Although, usually that doesn't stop him...
Anarkistsdream wrote:Looks like Fircoal has submarined to me... Don't know why, unless he thinks posting will make him look bad. Although, usually that doesn't stop him...
Vote: Fircoal
What does submarined mean?
Basically, ignoring the thread.
Ok, thanks. I think a lot of people have been doing this, but Fircoal has posted regularly.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Looks like Fircoal has submarined to me... Don't know why, unless he thinks posting will make him look bad. Although, usually that doesn't stop him...
Vote: Fircoal
I agree. it's either that or some really evil post restriction (especially for him) that limits him to posting only at l-1 or something. vote fircoal
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
The guys that have voted fircoal, I'm really not seeing the argument. Please explain why you have voted as such.
Spiesr, I agree it's seems a bit strange, but why is it suspicious? Especially as the one he seemingly opted not to vote for is town-side
I would also like to apologise to Spin, my entire reasoning for voting him was because I didn't think he should be voting for someone without giving a proper reason other than "We need a lynch", then everyone who voted used that reason themselves. I did not realise it was acceptable under those circumstances...
Clive wrote:Spiesr, I agree it's seems a bit strange, but why is it suspicious? Especially as the one he seemingly opted not to vote for is town-side
At that time we were close to the deadline, he could have hammered (cast the last vote). But he voted for someone else instead, that could have forced a no lynch (Generally considered bad). He did change his vote right after though...
At that time, the only he could have know spin was town is if he was mafia.
Clive wrote:Spiesr, I agree it's seems a bit strange, but why is it suspicious? Especially as the one he seemingly opted not to vote for is town-side
At that time we were close to the deadline, he could have hammered (cast the last vote). But he voted for someone else instead, that could have forced a no lynch (Generally considered bad). He did change his vote right after though...
At that time, the only he could have know spin was town is if he was mafia.
I hadn't considered the option that it could have been forcing a no-lynch. I thought you were saying that they must both ahve been mafia, and therefore why he opted not to vote for Spin. I get what you are saying now, but as you pointed out, he changed the vote right after, so I can believe it was down to skimming.
Not that I think much of basing a vote desicion on a skim read.