World too populated?

[bradleybadly]

It's usually the people who bitch the loudest about overpopulation & the environment that are more than willing to dictate to everyone else what they have to change in their lives, but they rarely make the same changes in their own lives.

[DaGip]

Ne1 who thinls the world is overpopulated can help fix the problem by a:getting castrated b:removing themselves from life

I like my balls...you get yours cut off first!

May I do the honors?

New Game! Bobbin' For Balls!

[Chris7He]

It's usually the people who bitch the loudest about overpopulation & the environment that are more than willing to dictate to everyone else what they have to change in their lives, but they rarely make the same changes in their own lives.

Thats cus wes smarts nuff ta figur oat thers a probem.

[freezie]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

[silvanricky]

World Overpopulation, Global Warming, Meteors might slam into the earth and destroy us all - aaaaagggghhhhhh!!!!!



Just enjoy your life

[DaGip]

World Overpopulation, Global Warming, Meteors might slam into the earth and destroy us all - aaaaagggghhhhhh!!!!!



Just enjoy your life

Commie!

[Chris7He]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

How about we just kill the girls who are fat then the girls with fake and flat boobs and then the girls who are deemed she-males and then the girls who are ugly and then the girls who are not SUPER HOT?

AND THEN

We do it the same way, but for guys.

[muy_thaiguy]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

How about we just kill the girls who are fat then the girls with fake and flat boobs and then the girls who are deemed she-males and then the girls who are ugly and then the girls who are not SUPER HOT?

AND THEN

We do it the same way, but for guys.

So, either way, you're first to go then.


Everyone wins!

[Chris7He]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

How about we just kill the girls who are fat then the girls with fake and flat boobs and then the girls who are deemed she-males and then the girls who are ugly and then the girls who are not SUPER HOT?

AND THEN

We do it the same way, but for guys.

So, either way, you're first to go then.


Everyone wins!

No. I'd be second to go. YOU will be the first to go.

[bradleybadly]

You're both wrong, it would be Rosie O'Donnell

[Neutrino]

Give 'em to necrophiliacs

naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemly

I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.

You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...

Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.

Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.

Actually, burying the corpses would be a far more risky move than burning them. The corpses in mass graves would rot and begin to spread disease, while burnt corpses can't rot and so wouldn't have much of an effect at all (except for all the reosurces you used to burn them all).

[Chris7He]

Give 'em to necrophiliacs

naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemly

I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.

You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...

Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.

Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.

Actually, burying the corpses would be a far more risky move than burning them. The corpses in mass graves would rot and begin to spread disease, while burnt corpses can't rot and so wouldn't have much of an effect at all (except for all the reosurces you used to burn them all).

You could just sprinkle some oil over one body and feed another body into it and then another and then another and never let the fire die. I mean if the Nazis can do it, then us anal rejectives can do it too.

[Neutrino]

Give 'em to necrophiliacs

naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemly

I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.

You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...

Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.

Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.

Actually, burying the corpses would be a far more risky move than burning them. The corpses in mass graves would rot and begin to spread disease, while burnt corpses can't rot and so wouldn't have much of an effect at all (except for all the reosurces you used to burn them all).

You could just sprinkle some oil over one body and feed another body into it and then another and then another and never let the fire die. I mean if the Nazis can do it, then us anal rejectives can do it too.

Suprisingly enough, I don't think a human body burns well enough to qualify for the "fuel" part of a fire. Far too much liquid to burn properly. And before you ask, dehydrating corpses en-masse will not work.

[Chris7He]

naw that wouldnt work....youd get a public outcry at that sort of thing, its unseemly

I was joking. I think we should burn 'em as fuel or stick 'em in the ground. We have enough room.

You could have them fed to wildlife or cannibalized...

Burning = Mass amounts of disease would spread if not contaminated early and too much carbon dioxide.

Burying = Probably would work. We could stick a few thousand in the Himalayas.

Actually, burying the corpses would be a far more risky move than burning them. The corpses in mass graves would rot and begin to spread disease, while burnt corpses can't rot and so wouldn't have much of an effect at all (except for all the reosurces you used to burn them all).

You could just sprinkle some oil over one body and feed another body into it and then another and then another and never let the fire die. I mean if the Nazis can do it, then us anal rejectives can do it too.

Suprisingly enough, I don't think a human body burns well enough to qualify for the "fuel" part of a fire. Far too much liquid to burn properly. And before you ask, dehydrating corpses en-masse will not work.

Then do it the way the Nazis did with the crematoriums. They were able to kill eleven million easy.

[Neutrino]

Then do it the way the Nazis did with the crematoriums. They were able to kill eleven million easy.

That's 'cause the spent a small fortune on building and maintaining the damn things.
Also, the crematoriums killed no-one. That's what the gas chambers and firing squads were for.

[freezie]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

How about we just kill the girls who are fat then the girls with fake and flat boobs and then the girls who are deemed she-males and then the girls who are ugly and then the girls who are not SUPER HOT?

AND THEN

We do it the same way, but for guys.

So, your whole point reside on the fact a girl is inteligent if she is super-hot.

I think you just proved that you would go #1 your way..

[Chris7He]

World is not over-populated. There is too many morons.

Get all the guys out, but me. Then the world shall live better.


Of course, you'd have to get 60-90% of the girls out too...

How about we just kill the girls who are fat then the girls with fake and flat boobs and then the girls who are deemed she-males and then the girls who are ugly and then the girls who are not SUPER HOT?

AND THEN

We do it the same way, but for guys.

So, your whole point reside on the fact a girl is inteligent if she is super-hot.

I think you just proved that you would go #1 your way..

I didn't say they would be smart, but they could make some damn lovin'...

[Chris7He]

Then do it the way the Nazis did with the crematoriums. They were able to kill eleven million easy.

That's 'cause the spent a small fortune on building and maintaining the damn things.
Also, the crematoriums killed no-one. That's what the gas chambers and firing squads were for.

Yeah. It was quite an efficient and quick way of killing people. A pellet of gas could kill a roomful of people. thousands of people were gassed everyday and if we build enough of these, we can turn the tide for mankind.

[Chris7He]

So, your whole point reside on the fact a girl is inteligent if she is super-hot.

I think you just proved that you would go #1 your way..

Maybe we can just kill all the Americans (I'm one of them). That way we get rid of half of the world's obesity problems (I'm not fat myself, though).

[Neutrino]

So, your whole point reside on the fact a girl is inteligent if she is super-hot.

I think you just proved that you would go #1 your way..

Maybe we can just kill all the Americans (I'm one of them). That way we get rid of half of the world's obesity problems (I'm not fat myself, though).

'Cause, you know killing off the majority of the inhabitants of a continent for no particular reason could never be considered "extreme"


Am I the only one here who's getting the feeling that arguing why killing millions of people to solve a problem that can be solved a multitude of other ways (which involve far less raw human suffering and such) with this guy is exceedingly pointless, at best?[/quote]

[freezie]

No neut..Killing millions of people is not a solution...Whatever the problem is.

[Chris7He]

So, your whole point reside on the fact a girl is inteligent if she is super-hot.

I think you just proved that you would go #1 your way..

Maybe we can just kill all the Americans (I'm one of them). That way we get rid of half of the world's obesity problems (I'm not fat myself, though).

'Cause, you know killing off the majority of the inhabitants of a continent for no particular reason could never be considered "extreme"


Am I the only one here who's getting the feeling that arguing why killing millions of people to solve a problem that can be solved a multitude of other ways (which involve far less raw human suffering and such) with this guy is exceedingly pointless, at best?

[/quote]

It's not suffering if I give them euthanasia. Mass murder is the answer to everything!

[Neutrino]

It's not suffering if I give them euthanasia. Mass murder is the answer to everything!

Since paragraphs don't seem to be getting the point across, I'll go the other extreme.

No.

[Chris7He]

It's not suffering if I give them euthanasia. Mass murder is the answer to everything!

Since paragraphs don't seem to be getting the point across, I'll go the other extreme.

No.

You know... Hitler, Himmler, Stalin, and Lenin were my four favorite people. I used to have posters of them all over my room. I used to vandalize the school with their symbols until I got suspended for racism.

[DaGip]

Okay! Here is my solution...we invent some type of Nanotechnology that you can program to shut off sperm manufaturing from the testes...you can shut off sperm production or turn it on when you need to start making more babies!