Pornography Mafia - Day 5

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:52 am

I feel like we are at a standstill here. Nothing stands out.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:03 am

unless theres more discussion though, its unlikely anything is going to come out today, which only leaves us with the bandwagon lynch and nks to really talk about....

even my argument against nag is pretty shaky ground, but without much posting, there isnt much chance of improving things.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:18 am

can we maybe get skoffin and nes prodded or maybe replaced....skoffin was the very first post in this thread and hasnt posted since, and i dont think nes has been much better.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:52 pm

I will prod both, and I'll try to get people who accept to play in this game and who will talk..

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:20 am

got tonkaed wrote:you guys are lame....

nag is still suspicious about the illiad thing until we find out more about said illiad for the website, even though he did advocate getting rid of a faction that is seemingly town

and skoffin to my knowledge hasnt posted

vote nag until something better comes along.

Wha?

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:20 am

I'm not thats what I'm saying tonka's argument for voting me is a complete fabrication.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:43 pm

post count please.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:43 pm

The Weird One wrote:post count please.

Your post count is 6178, or something.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:44 pm

VOTE COUNT.
nagerous (1) - got tonkaed

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:35 pm

I disagree with Tonka's vote on Nag, and besides, in this situation, we should pick on people more suitable to lynch.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:36 pm

Deadline - 48 hours.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Thu Dec 13, 2007 9:37 pm

Fircoal wrote:I disagree with Tonka's vote on Nag, and besides, in this situation, we should pick on people more suitable to lynch.

in all likelyhood, ill be switching my vote to the eventual most suitable candidate theory, but at the moment i might as well have it on the player whose done the most notable thing thus far, outside of diddle or myself.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:36 am

I really don't know what to do this day

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:19 am

GT, thats the second person whose being trying to get the game moving, that you started an argument with.

Vote Tonka

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:27 am

vote nes be careful about lynching gt. he might be a jester as he normally doesn't start dumb arguments like that. i'm voting nes since he sure isn't helping at all.

diddle · Post by **diddle** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:10 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:vote nes be careful about lynching gt. he might be a jester as he normally doesn't start dumb arguments like that. i'm voting nes since he sure isn't helping at all.

There not dumb arguments, just very picky

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:50 pm

diddle wrote:GT, thats the second person whose being trying to get the game moving, that you started an argument with.

Vote Tonka

I agree. Unvote vote tonka

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 1:31 pm

The Weird One wrote:
diddle wrote:GT, thats the second person whose being trying to get the game moving, that you started an argument with.

Vote Tonka
I agree. Unvote vote tonka

I don't. I think that we shouldn't, lynch the good players, when they barely did anything wrong.

Vote: NES

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:04 pm

i suppose thats a fair point diddle. In a lot of ways i guess when theres not a lot of activity anyone who is active is probably going to be under more scrutiny. Your probably fair in saying i wouldnt be pushing on nag if there had been a lot of posts.

mea culpa....unvote

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:40 pm

Might as well
unvote vote NES

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 3:45 am

Argh...

Old habits don't die do they?

Vote: NES

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 6:33 am

lots of bandwagoning going on in here.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 7:11 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:lots of bandwagoning going on in here.

i think its just part of people not really knowing what to do right now. Theres so little actual gameplay talk that we are going to have a hard time getting anything out of this day without more talking. And nes is a pretty easy target given the circumstances.

jnd94 · Post by **jnd94** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:39 am

vote NES

A bandwagon may get this game moving.

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sat Dec 15, 2007 1:04 pm

Theres very little to go on. I want to call people on mindlessly bandwagoning. However, its got to that stage where it can't be considered a proper scum tell. Especially since mafia players appear scared to vote me but are happy to appear out of nowhere and vote NES. Syzygy hasn't posted much and just appears to vote NES and leave so he certainly gets a FOS. Skoffin also is very quiet. I believe we should not bother with these potential leads however until the next day phase and instead vote NES because the deadline is in fact approaching.