Moderator: Community Team
I also voted for myself, based on this same logic. How can you know unless they're your scum pal?Sierra_Leon wrote:WTF?! Day 2 and we're down from 12 to 6 people!![]()
I've never heard of hunters before. Same color as the tracker, so he was definately pro-town.
Anyhow, I had something on my mind since day 1, but I didn't want to bring it out until after the first night. Why would you vote for anyone but yourself?! Assuming you are a townie, you have nobody you can trust. Why trust kwanton? Unless he's your scum buddie ofcourse.
FOS kwanton. (I don't expect you to lynch yourself though)
I would suggest that everyone reveals who they voted for. I voted for myself.
I like this idea, since we can't lynch in the traditional way we may as well discuss who should be king during the day phases. But, as you pointed out, the only problem is that person we decide should be king is pretty much guaranteed a scum NK. Though that might not be a bad thing as we may still have a Tracker/Watcher left somewhere. I know Diddle was and is dead, but I won't put it past spin to have another in a game like this, he knows what roles would be useful and good for us to have around, but for some reason I'm thinking theres definitly a lack of protective roles.Sierra_Leon wrote:This is why we shouldn't have random-lynched on day 1. I've got nothing.![]()
I have this idea about the voting for kings that might help though. If all townies keep voting for themselves, it will be far too easy for scum to have one of them become king. We should use the day-time to vote for who should be king. Then when night falls, everybody votes for the person that got the most votes during day-time, even if you don't fully agree. Scum could still vote for someone else, but with all the town's votes focused on one person that person should definitely get most votes. I see only one big drawback: scum could kill the person we voted for. I'm kinda hoping there's a doctor around to protect the person we vote king, but somehow I doubt it... What do you all think of this?
Looking this post, it pings my scumdar.dustn64 wrote:So, I guess villagers are vanilla, and hunters are vigs?
Agreed. Oh Mr. King, will you please see this post and may it's tidings help you make your choice tonight.The1exile wrote:Looking this post, it pings my scumdar.dustn64 wrote:So, I guess villagers are vanilla, and hunters are vigs?
He should know that villagers are vanilla and hunters are vigs if he's either of them. Our tracker is dead (I don't think we'll get a cop therefore), and we've established that protective roles are pretty much out of it, so likelihood is he's scum.
Hush, you'll blow our cover!kalishnikov wrote:Also, I'd second a vote for Sierra for king for the next day because, yes; he is my scum pal.
I'm not a villager or a hunter. I'll tell you now. What do you want me to say? I'm not scum.The1exile wrote:Looking this post, it pings my scumdar.dustn64 wrote:So, I guess villagers are vanilla, and hunters are vigs?
He should know that villagers are vanilla and hunters are vigs if he's either of them. Our tracker is dead (I don't think we'll get a cop therefore), and we've established that protective roles are pretty much out of it, so likelihood is he's scum.